From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-105838-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16700 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2004 17:08:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16262 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2004 17:08:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net) (194.217.242.91)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 26 Nov 2004 17:08:06 -0000
Received: from abyss2.demon.co.uk ([62.49.62.197] helo=[192.168.7.2])
	by anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42)
	id 1CXjZk-0006vV-Co; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:08:05 +0000
Subject: Re: C++ and Ada.
From: "Luke A. Guest" <laguest@abyss2.demon.co.uk>
To: Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com>
Cc: Daniel Lundqvist <daniel@malarhojden.nu>, GCC ML <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <415EBB91.3030503@gnat.com>
References: <415E9A68.5050009@malarhojden.nu> <415E9F37.8000504@gnat.com>
	 <415EB864.2090307@malarhojden.nu>  <415EBB91.3030503@gnat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1101488883.26204.5.camel@rogue.abyss2.demon.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:16:00 -0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg01031.txt.bz2

On Sat, 2004-10-02 at 15:30, Robert Dewar wrote:

> > With this new pragma support will there be any work to eliminate the 
> > need for manually specifying C++ mangled symbol names? If that is possible.
> 
> We don't have any plans, these pragmas are intended to be used with
> a binding generator, no free software binding generator is available
> yet.

It would be better if we could specify the compiler (and version) within
the pragma. This way we could specify what the member function name is
and have the Ada compiler generate the correctly mangled names for that
particular C++ compiler.

Sometimes, you have to generate bindings by hand :-(

Luke.