From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10578 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2004 23:18:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10548 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2004 23:18:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 28 Nov 2004 23:18:34 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iASNIYSd031559; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 18:18:34 -0500 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iASNIYr11964; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 18:18:34 -0500 Received: from vpn83-123.boston.redhat.com (IDENT:U2FsdGVkX1+ys8OK9FanRNA37wXhQDfUqci1rYs8D7A@vpn83-123.boston.redhat.com [172.16.83.123]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iASNIWoS029958; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 18:18:33 -0500 Subject: Re: Question re tree-ssa-ccp.c:substitute_and_fold From: Diego Novillo To: Richard Kenner Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" In-Reply-To: <10411282318.AA24220@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> References: <10411282318.AA24220@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Red Hat Canada Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 23:53:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1101683911.516.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg01100.txt.bz2 On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 18:18 -0500, Richard Kenner wrote: > I had to do the same thing on tree-cleanup-branch. Similar reasons. > You also want to unconditionally call modify_stmt in here. So you end > up with: > > Can you to import it in from that branch? I don't have that branch > checked out anyplace yet. Or else just send me the ChangeLog > for it and I'll do it. > Not really. The diff contains many other changes. That's inside a heavily re-written portion of the compiler. It's easier if you just c- n-p the snippet I sent. The only difference with your patch is that it unconditionally calls modify_stmt. The rest is identical. Diego.