From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31301 invoked by alias); 2 May 2005 15:44:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31242 invoked from network); 2 May 2005 15:43:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dberlin.org) (68.164.203.246) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 2 May 2005 15:43:56 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (HELO localhost) by dberlin.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 7949228; Mon, 02 May 2005 11:43:55 -0400 Subject: Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? From: Daniel Berlin To: Marc Espie Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20050502084144.1F5EFE257@quatramaran.ens.fr> References: <20050427152844.GA86951@compsoc.man.ac.uk> <426FB37D.3060507@3am-software.com> <200504272157.21513.s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl> <20050502084144.1F5EFE257@quatramaran.ens.fr> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 15:44:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1115048635.7870.5.camel@IBM-82ZWS052TEN.watson.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00051.txt.bz2 > Do you know why GCC4 is deprecated on sparc-openbsd ? It's simply > because no-one so far has been able to dedicate the CPU time to track > down the few bugs that prevented us from switching to gcc 3.x from 2.95. > > That's right, I said CPU-time. It takes too long to bootstrap the compiler, > it takes too long to rebuild the whole system. And thus, it rots. > -bash-2.05b$ perl userlookup.pl "%espie%" Name:espie@schutzenberger.liafa.jussieu.fr ID:569 mysql> select COUNT(*) from bugs where reporter = 569; +----------+ | COUNT(*) | +----------+ | 0 | +----------+ 1 row in set (0.06 sec) mysql> select COUNT(*) from longdescs where who = 569; +----------+ | COUNT(*) | +----------+ | 1 | +----------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) mysql> select COUNT(*) from attachments where submitter_id = 569; +----------+ | COUNT(*) | +----------+ | 0 | +----------+ 1 row in set (3.59 sec)