From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16919 invoked by alias); 28 May 2005 19:07:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16337 invoked by uid 22791); 28 May 2005 19:07:13 -0000 Received: from h-68-164-203-246.nycmny83.covad.net (HELO dberlin.org) (68.164.203.246) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2005 19:07:13 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (HELO localhost) by dberlin.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 8114225; Sat, 28 May 2005 15:07:11 -0400 Subject: Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] From: Daniel Berlin To: Scott Robert Ladd Cc: Uros Bizjak , gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <4298A5B0.1020304@coyotegulch.com> References: <42988B8C.2090905@kss-loka.si> <4298A5B0.1020304@coyotegulch.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 23:28:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1117307229.8107.8.camel@linux.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg01552.txt.bz2 On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 13:09 -0400, Scott Robert Ladd wrote: > Uros Bizjak wrote: > > At this point, I wonder what is wrong with Bugzilla, that those > > programmers don't fill a proper bug report. > > In my experience, people don't file Bugzilla reports because it feels > impersonal and unresponsive. The form is not very user-friendly (as in > friendly to users of GCC, not its developers.) I have a hard time believing this, considering they'd see the same form reporting bugs anywhere else, too, and thus, are probably used to it. They could also send random emails to gcc-bugs.