From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>
To: Giovanni Bajo <giovannibajo@libero.it>
Cc: Michael Veksler <VEKSLER@il.ibm.com>,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org, themis_hv@yahoo.co.uk
Subject: Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point]
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 16:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1117424514.16811.1.camel@linux.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001e01c5643c$4cdf38c0$bebc2997@bagio>
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 12:50 +0200, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> Michael Veksler <VEKSLER@il.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, this is not 100% correct. Recently I have filed several
> > duplicates, *after* searching Bugzilla.
>
> That is not a problem. Bugmasters are there exactly for that. We realize that
> finding duplicates can be very hard (in fact, sometimes duplicates are
> acknowledged as such only after a fix appears), so that is our work. We just
> ask users for some *basic* duplicate checking, and I think most users do that
> before filing bugreports. So it's ok.
>
>
> > 3. Nontrivial search of GCC Bugzilla are, sometimes,
> > extremely slow (over a minute).
>
> 3 could be worked on (Daniel?)
Send me the URL's for the buglists and i'll look at the queries (The url
for the buglist contains the query).
A lot of this is mysql's query engine being stupid, and is hopefully
fixed in 4.x or 5.x (sourceware is still on 3.x).
I'm happy to optimize the searchs as best i can (by adding lame extra
indexes if necessary :P)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-30 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-28 17:10 Uros Bizjak
2005-05-28 23:02 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-28 23:28 ` Daniel Berlin
2005-05-28 23:29 ` William Beebe
2005-05-29 4:47 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-29 18:32 ` Kai Henningsen
2005-05-29 18:52 ` William Beebe
2005-05-29 19:24 ` What is wrong with Bugzilla? Russ Allbery
2005-05-30 16:32 ` William Beebe
2005-05-30 19:22 ` Russ Allbery
2005-05-30 15:35 ` What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Kai Henningsen
2005-05-31 3:50 ` chris jefferson
2005-05-31 5:56 ` Gary Funck
2005-05-31 6:04 ` Paul Brook
2005-05-30 15:39 ` Daniel Berlin
2005-05-29 1:30 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-29 15:57 ` Giovanni Bajo
2005-05-29 18:05 ` Michael Veksler
2005-05-30 15:34 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-30 15:48 ` Daniel Berlin
2005-05-30 15:31 ` Vincent Lefevre
[not found] ` <26669933.1117479096256.JavaMail.root@dtm1eusosrv72.dtm.ops.eu.uu.net>
2005-05-30 21:17 ` Toon Moene
2005-05-31 11:24 ` Robert Dewar
2005-06-06 21:47 ` Laurent GUERBY
2005-06-06 23:23 ` Robert Dewar
2005-06-09 7:44 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-31 12:51 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-31 13:17 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-05-31 13:44 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-31 14:32 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-05-31 15:10 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-31 15:58 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-05-31 16:53 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-31 17:03 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-05-31 18:40 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-31 19:28 ` Jakub Jelinek
2005-05-31 23:30 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-31 18:35 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-31 17:44 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-31 20:11 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-05-31 23:53 ` Vincent Lefevre
[not found] ` <jefyw3jguf.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
[not found] ` <20050531224258.GJ3541@ay.vinc17.org>
[not found] ` <jemzqb2eb2.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
2005-06-01 0:23 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-06-01 8:42 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-05-31 17:21 ` Mike Stump
2005-05-31 17:44 ` Dave Korn
2005-06-01 1:57 ` Marcin Dalecki
2005-05-31 19:27 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-31 19:58 ` Mike Stump
2005-05-31 23:40 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-06-01 5:59 ` Alan Modra
2005-06-01 7:21 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-06-01 17:32 ` Mike Stump
2005-06-01 18:01 ` Daniel Berlin
2005-06-01 18:33 ` Mike Stump
2005-05-29 20:13 ` Joseph S. Myers
2005-05-29 20:18 ` Haren Visavadia
2005-05-30 15:40 ` Daniel Berlin
2005-05-30 15:31 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-30 20:12 ` Haren Visavadia
2005-05-30 20:13 ` Robert Dewar
2005-05-30 20:34 ` Haren Visavadia
2005-05-30 20:46 ` Robert Dewar
2005-05-30 21:10 ` Haren Visavadia
2005-05-31 9:11 ` Robert Dewar
2005-05-31 12:33 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-31 12:48 ` Andrew Haley
2005-05-31 13:35 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-31 14:08 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-06-22 19:44 ` What is wrong with Bugzilla? Gerald Pfeifer
2005-05-29 7:33 ` What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Ross Smith
2005-05-29 7:51 ` Joe Buck
2005-05-29 9:56 ` R Hill
2005-05-30 17:03 ` What is wrong with Bugzilla? Zack Weinberg
2005-05-30 19:39 ` Gary Funck
2005-05-30 15:48 ` What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Daniel Berlin
2005-05-31 7:40 ` R Hill
2005-05-31 12:04 ` What is wrong with Bugzilla? Russ Allbery
2005-05-31 12:08 ` R Hill
2005-05-31 17:14 ` Dave Korn
2005-05-31 17:14 ` Daniel Berlin
2005-05-31 17:43 ` Dave Korn
2005-05-31 19:18 ` Daniel Berlin
2005-05-31 19:43 ` Dave Korn
2005-05-31 17:22 ` What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Hugh Sasse
2005-05-29 12:54 ` Haren Visavadia
2005-05-29 15:19 ` Michael Veksler
2005-05-29 15:38 ` Giovanni Bajo
2005-05-29 18:16 ` Michael Veksler
2005-05-30 16:07 ` Daniel Berlin [this message]
2005-05-30 15:36 ` Michael Veksler
2005-05-30 15:28 ` Daniel Berlin
2005-05-30 15:28 ` Daniel Berlin
2005-05-29 17:23 ` Haren Visavadia
2005-05-30 15:25 ` Joe Buck
2005-05-30 15:31 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-30 15:43 ` Daniel Berlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1117424514.16811.1.camel@linux.site \
--to=dberlin@dberlin.org \
--cc=VEKSLER@il.ibm.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=giovannibajo@libero.it \
--cc=themis_hv@yahoo.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).