From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-116247-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18128 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2005 22:44:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18120 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Jun 2005 22:44:06 -0000
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 22:44:06 +0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5LMi4mO023428
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:44:04 -0400
Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j5LMi4u25490;
	Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:44:04 -0400
Received: from vpn50-3.rdu.redhat.com (vpn50-3.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.3])
	by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j5LMi1WM001054;
	Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:44:02 -0400
Subject: Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2
From: Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <1119393060.16400.11.camel@dzur.sfbay.redhat.com>
References: <20050620054650.GA2377@linux.comp>
	 <1119246588.3334.9.camel@dzur.sfbay.redhat.com>
	 <20050620061224.GA22668@linux.comp>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.61.0506201053530.6452@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
	 <1119392192.16400.3.camel@dzur.sfbay.redhat.com>
	 <200506212224.j5LMOAS4007383@greed.delorie.com>
	 <1119393060.16400.11.camel@dzur.sfbay.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 22:44:00 -0000
Message-Id: <1119393839.16400.15.camel@dzur.sfbay.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00958.txt.bz2

On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 15:31 -0700, Eric Christopher wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 18:24 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > > Like so? Tested by building outside the source directory and
> > > attempting to build in the source directory. Did we want something
> > > like this for mainline too?
> > 
> > We've historically put a lot of effort into making "./configure" work,
> > so I'd hate to snub anyone willing to work on it.  Perhaps an "at the
> > moment" in the message might be good.

I also changed the error message to read:

"... is not supported in this release"

Which might work and we can, of course, remove the error message if that
ever changes :)

OK?

-eric