From: Laurent GUERBY <laurent@guerby.net>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Ada] Patch needed to boostrap Ada on x86_64 as of 20050628
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 20:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1119991811.8919.400.camel@pc.site> (raw)
Ada bootstraps fine without patch on x86-linux, however
on x86_64 bootstrap fail because of:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22212
The following patch is a workaround for it, it enables
a full bootstrap and only 2 additional FAIL in ACATS,
results here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-06/msg01693.html
Laurent
Index: gnattools/Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gnattools/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 Makefile.in
--- gnattools/Makefile.in 30 Mar 2005 08:56:55 -0000 1.4
+++ gnattools/Makefile.in 28 Jun 2005 20:45:29 -0000
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
"CC=../../xgcc -B../../" \
"CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) $(WARN_CFLAGS)" \
"LDFLAGS=$(LDFLAGS)" \
- "ADAFLAGS=$(ADAFLAGS)" \
+ "ADAFLAGS=$(ADAFLAGS) -O0" \
"INCLUDES=$(INCLUDES_FOR_SUBDIR)" \
"ADA_INCLUDES=-I- -I../rts $(ADA_INCLUDES_FOR_SUBDIR)"\
"exeext=$(exeext)" \
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@
TOOLS_FLAGS_TO_PASS_NATIVE= \
"CC=../../xgcc -B../../" \
"CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS)" \
- "ADAFLAGS=$(ADAFLAGS)" \
+ "ADAFLAGS=$(ADAFLAGS) -O0" \
"INCLUDES=$(INCLUDES_FOR_SUBDIR)" \
"ADA_INCLUDES=-I../rts $(ADA_INCLUDES_FOR_SUBDIR)" \
"exeext=$(exeext)" \
Index: gcc/ada/Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/ada/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.118
diff -u -r1.118 Makefile.in
--- gcc/ada/Makefile.in 16 Jun 2005 09:00:01 -0000 1.118
+++ gcc/ada/Makefile.in 28 Jun 2005 20:45:30 -0000
@@ -1994,6 +1994,10 @@
$(CC) -c $(ALL_ADAFLAGS) $(FORCE_DEBUG_ADAFLAGS) -O1 -fno-inline
\
$(ADA_INCLUDES) $< $(OUTPUT_OPTION)
+a-strfix.o : a-strfix.adb a-strfix.ads
+ $(CC) -c $(ALL_ADAFLAGS) $(FORCE_DEBUG_ADAFLAGS) -O0 \
+ $(ADA_INCLUDES) $< $(OUTPUT_OPTION)
+
# force debugging information on s-assert.o so that it is always
# possible to set breakpoint on assert failures.
next reply other threads:[~2005-06-28 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-28 20:50 Laurent GUERBY [this message]
2005-06-29 6:16 ` Laurent GUERBY
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1119991811.8919.400.camel@pc.site \
--to=laurent@guerby.net \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).