From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27685 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2005 21:54:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27491 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2005 21:54:39 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:54:39 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5TLrQ2r024586; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:53:26 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j5TLrQu13312; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:53:26 -0400 Received: from vpn26-6.sfbay.redhat.com (vpn26-6.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.26.6]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j5TLrLAV030860; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:53:23 -0400 Subject: Re: Re: From: Jeffrey A Law Reply-To: law@redhat.com To: Mark Mitchell Cc: Bryce McKinlay , tromey@redhat.com, Java Patch List , gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <42C30712.5070109@codesourcery.com> References: <42C2ECA9.3050707@redhat.com> <42C30712.5070109@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:54:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1120081999.4621.200.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg01279.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 13:39 -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > First, we're close to a release. We've been waiting on one fix since > Friday, and Jeff Law has promised to fix it today. The fix is written, I'm just waiting on test results. Someone mucked up the hpux11 target description (*) which caused libstdc++ to fail to build and I had to re-bootstrap after working around that bit of lameness. I'd be surprised if I had results tonight. More likely early tomorrow assuming the machines keep running (I killed one in Raleigh yesterday to go along with the one in my basement...) Jeff (*) The hpux11 target description assumes that the linker shipped with hpux11 supports +init as an option. Well, that may work OK for some versions of hpux11, but it certainly doesn't work for hpux11.00 with the 990903 version of the linker. Grrr.