From: Jeffrey A Law <law@redhat.com>
To: Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>,
Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay@redhat.com>,
tromey@redhat.com, Java Patch List <java-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Re: hpux regression vs 4.0.1
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 23:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1120088666.4621.207.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050629231718.GA10549@synopsys.com>
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 16:17 -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 03:53:18PM -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> > (*) The hpux11 target description assumes that the linker shipped with
> > hpux11 supports +init as an option. Well, that may work OK for some
> > versions of hpux11, but it certainly doesn't work for hpux11.00 with
> > the 990903 version of the linker. Grrr.
>
> I have an hpux11.0 box available, and could run tests of your patch
> if you like.
I doubt it would have (or will make) much of a difference at this
point. I don't think anyone could have predicted the muck-up with
the arguments passed to ld and the re-bootstrap that had to run
after working around it.
As long as I don't kill this 3rd machine I think we'll be OK.
jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-29 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <m3d5q5b0pw.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
2005-06-29 18:48 ` Bryce McKinlay
2005-06-29 20:40 ` Re: Mark Mitchell
2005-06-29 21:54 ` Re: Jeffrey A Law
2005-06-29 23:17 ` Re: Joe Buck
2005-06-29 23:45 ` Jeffrey A Law [this message]
2005-06-29 21:57 ` Re: Geoffrey Keating
2005-06-29 23:43 ` Re: Aalokrai Porwal
2005-06-30 0:34 Re: hpux regression vs 4.0.1 John David Anglin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1120088666.4621.207.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=law@redhat.com \
--cc=Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=java-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
--cc=mckinlay@redhat.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).