From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7767 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2005 21:19:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 7752 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Nov 2005 21:19:20 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from w099.z064220152.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net (HELO duck.specifix.com) (64.220.152.99) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:19:03 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (duck.corp.specifix.com [192.168.1.1]) by duck.specifix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20671FC47; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:19:01 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: can DECL_RESULT be 0? From: James E Wilson To: Rafael =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C1vila?= de =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Esp=EDndola?= Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <200511201801.59206.rafael.espindola@gmail.com> References: <200511121006.08293.rafael.espindola@gmail.com> <200511151933.04687.rafael.espindola@gmail.com> <437D2FC9.6090009@specifix.com> <200511201801.59206.rafael.espindola@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: <1132607938.11623.17.camel@aretha.corp.specifix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:19:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg01006.txt.bz2 On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 12:01, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote: > What do you thing about adding an assert? Something similar to the attached > patch. I think there is no chance of a user seeing this problem. It can only occur when working on a front end, in which case the problem would be obvious to the developer, and would be fixed before end users ever saw it. I don't really see a need for extra checks here. -- Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.specifix.com