From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31779 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2006 20:01:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 31769 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Mar 2006 20:01:29 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from 26.mail-out.ovh.net (HELO 26.mail-out.ovh.net) (213.186.42.179) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 20:01:26 +0000 Received: (qmail 22850 invoked by uid 503); 2 Mar 2006 19:53:19 -0000 Received: (QMFILT: 1.0); 02 Mar 2006 19:53:19 -0000 Received: from b6.ovh.net (HELO mail58.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.56) by 26.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 2 Mar 2006 19:53:19 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue-out) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 2 Mar 2006 19:53:07 -0000 Received: from mail58.ha.ovh.net (10.0.50.58) by mail58.ha.ovh.net with SMTP; 2 Mar 2006 19:53:04 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue-pre) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 2 Mar 2006 19:53:04 -0000 Received: from gut75-4-82-235-162-148.fbx.proxad.net (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (laurent%guerby.net@82.235.162.148) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 2 Mar 2006 19:53:04 -0000 Subject: Re: ACATS c460008 and VRP From: Laurent GUERBY To: Robert Dewar Cc: Richard Kenner , gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <44063D97.1040604@adacore.com> References: <10603012348.AA17328@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <1141257264.24449.73.camel@pc.site> <44063D97.1040604@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 20:01:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1141329180.24449.90.camel@pc.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Ovh-Remote: 82.235.162.148 (gut75-4-82-235-162-148.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: fait|type 1&3|0.0|H 0.5 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00128.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 01:34 +0100, Robert Dewar wrote: > Laurent GUERBY wrote: > > > VRP might now force us to update the overflow list but I'm not sure > > about switching to a full -gnato everywhere. > > well you can expect some fiddling each version if you work this way The list for -gnato tests hasn't changed since it's initial import into GCC in 2003-10-27, and was present in early versions of acats4gnat may be a year before. Not yet in the "fiddling each version" category :). Laurent