From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>
To: mrs@wrs.com (Mike Stump)
Cc: egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: small patch 
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 1998 04:31:00 -0000
Message-id: <12236.884677696@hurl.cygnus.com>
References: <199801122240.OAA16601@kankakee.wrs.com>
X-SW-Source: 1998-01/msg00348.html

  In message < 199801122240.OAA16601@kankakee.wrs.com >you write:
  > Here is a small patch to avoid a failure on VxWorks:
  > 
  > Doing diffs in gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs:
  > *** gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900520_05.C.~1~	Mon Jan 12 13:5
  > 3:27 1998
  > --- gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900520_05.C	Mon Jan 12 13:54:48 199
  > 8
  > *************** struct struct_0 {
  > *** 8,14 ****
  >   };
  >   
  >   char *cp;
  > ! struct_0 *sp;
  >   
  >   void test0 ()
  >   {
  > --- 8,14 ----
  >   };
  >   
  >   char *cp;
  > ! static struct_0 *sp;
  >   
  >   void test0 ()
  >   {
  > --------------
Huh?  Something's rather bogus here.  Why does adding a static help
VxWorks?

jeff