From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeffrey A Law To: egcs@egcs.cygnus.com Subject: No Subject Date: Sat, 24 Apr 1999 22:26:00 -0000 Message-id: <1235.924996268@upchuck.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 1999-04/msg00858.html ------- Forwarded Message - ------- Start of forwarded message ------- Sender: Gabriel.Dos-Reis@cmla.ens-cachan.fr To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: egcs@egcs.cygnus.com Subject: Re: C++: STL 3.2 References: < Pine.GSO.4.10.9904231640040.22202-100000@markab.dbai.tuwien.ac.at > From: Gabriel Dos Reis In-Reply-To: Gerald Pfeifer's message of "Fri, 23 Apr 1999 16:44:13 +0200 (MET DST)" Organization: CMLA, ENS Cachan -- CNRS URA 1611 (France) Date: 23 Apr 1999 17:22:20 +0200 Message-ID: Lines: 15 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/Emacs 19.34 Gerald Pfeifer writes: | STL 3.2 has been release yesterday: | http://www.sgi.com/Technology/STL/whats_new.html | | This missed the "Feature freeze date" by one day, but -- considering the | relatively long life of our release branches and the usually high quality | of SGI STL releases -- may I suggest that we merge that in for 1.2? At this moment, we (on libstdc++-v3) haven't yet make a decision about which version of , we're going to use. On the other hand, SGI seems to be a replicata of . May I suggest to delay the merge? - -- Gaby - ------- End of forwarded message ------- ------- End of Forwarded Message From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeffrey A Law To: egcs@egcs.cygnus.com Subject: No Subject Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 23:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1235.924996268@upchuck.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 1999-04n/msg00864.html Message-ID: <19990430231500.EWMdwGDyVxVB3AKCQmisekNExcZi-7VQAYTH1tIbQ6E@z> ------- Forwarded Message - ------- Start of forwarded message ------- Sender: Gabriel.Dos-Reis@cmla.ens-cachan.fr To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: egcs@egcs.cygnus.com Subject: Re: C++: STL 3.2 References: < Pine.GSO.4.10.9904231640040.22202-100000@markab.dbai.tuwien.ac.at > From: Gabriel Dos Reis In-Reply-To: Gerald Pfeifer's message of "Fri, 23 Apr 1999 16:44:13 +0200 (MET DST)" Organization: CMLA, ENS Cachan -- CNRS URA 1611 (France) Date: 23 Apr 1999 17:22:20 +0200 Message-ID: Lines: 15 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/Emacs 19.34 Gerald Pfeifer writes: | STL 3.2 has been release yesterday: | http://www.sgi.com/Technology/STL/whats_new.html | | This missed the "Feature freeze date" by one day, but -- considering the | relatively long life of our release branches and the usually high quality | of SGI STL releases -- may I suggest that we merge that in for 1.2? At this moment, we (on libstdc++-v3) haven't yet make a decision about which version of , we're going to use. On the other hand, SGI seems to be a replicata of . May I suggest to delay the merge? - -- Gaby - ------- End of forwarded message ------- ------- End of Forwarded Message