From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 592 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2009 15:50:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 581 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Apr 2009 15:50:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp22.services.sfr.fr (HELO smtp22.services.sfr.fr) (93.17.128.12) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Apr 2009 15:50:39 +0000 Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msfrf2212.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 82D5B700008D; Sun, 5 Apr 2009 17:50:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (10.174.71-86.rev.gaoland.net [86.71.174.10]) by msfrf2212.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 24BA1700008B; Sun, 5 Apr 2009 17:50:35 +0200 (CEST) X-SFR-UUID: 20090405155035150.24BA1700008B@msfrf2212.sfr.fr Subject: Annoucing regressions and bootstrap fail? (was: Bootstrap broken on sparc-linux trunk between 145310:145425 because of new genattrtab.c va_arg (p, HOST_WIDE_INT) warning) From: Laurent GUERBY Reply-To: laurent@guerby.net To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: gcc , Gerald Pfeifer In-Reply-To: <6dc9ffc80904050825k5d73c881u94114888269f06fb@mail.gmail.com> References: <1238923527.10782.51.camel@localhost> <6dc9ffc80904050825k5d73c881u94114888269f06fb@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 16:14:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1238946634.10782.116.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00171.txt.bz2 On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 08:25 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Laurent GUERBY wrote: > > I'm thinking of changing my auto tester to report a broken bootstrap > > (the first time a bootstrap fails), is there a normalized way to > > report such failures to gcc-testresults@ or gcc@? > > I report it to gcc-regression@. It's documented by http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html as "read-only": gcc-regression is a read-only moderate volume list where regression results for the GCC compilers are posted. So I thought one couldn't post to it. If there's consensus that's the right place to send automatic regression and bootstrap fail reports I'll do that then. Laurent