From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28411 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2009 10:34:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 28403 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jun 2009 10:34:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e23smtp07.au.ibm.com (HELO e23smtp07.au.ibm.com) (202.81.31.140) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:34:42 +0000 Received: from d23relay01.au.ibm.com (d23relay01.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.243]) by e23smtp07.au.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n53AYd4O000595 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 20:34:39 +1000 Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (d23av01.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.96]) by d23relay01.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n53AYd5I438480 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 20:34:39 +1000 Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av01.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n53AYdSs006382 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 20:34:39 +1000 Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (ozlabs.au.ibm.com [9.190.163.12]) by d23av01.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n53AYcFk006379; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 20:34:38 +1000 Received: from [9.185.118.45] (WECM01-9-185-118-45.au.ibm.com [9.185.118.45]) (using SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD6073602; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 20:34:38 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: Any comment about the replacement of gcc news? From: Ben Elliston To: Eric Fisher Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:34:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1244025277.9881.1.camel@helios> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00037.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 16:33 +0800, Eric Fisher wrote: > Sorry, I hope it's not an offensive or boring topic. No, just off-topic. This list is for developing gcc, not plotting our demise. Cheers, Ben