From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1121 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2009 16:24:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 1106 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Oct 2009 16:24:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e39.co.us.ibm.com (HELO e39.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.160) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:24:24 +0000 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e39.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n96GIcLf032104 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:18:38 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id n96GOI4h244402 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:24:18 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n96GOIT0002341 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:24:18 -0600 Received: from [9.47.18.91] (dyn9047018091.beaverton.ibm.com [9.47.18.91]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n96GOHdw002294; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:24:17 -0600 Subject: Re: new libstdc++-v3 decimal failures From: Janis Johnson Reply-To: janis187@us.ibm.com To: Jack Howarth Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20091006130424.GA4897@bromo.med.uc.edu> References: <20091006130424.GA4897@bromo.med.uc.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:24:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1254845428.6350.3.camel@janis-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00116.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 09:04 -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > Janis, > We are seeing failures of the new decimal testcases on x86_64-apple-darwin10 > which you committed into the libstdc++-v3 testsuite... > > FAIL: decimal/binary-arith.cc (test for excess errors) > WARNING: decimal/binary-arith.cc compilation failed to produce executable > > Are these tests entirely glibc-centric and shouldn't they be disabled for > darwin? Each test contains // { dg-require-effective-target-dfp } which checks that the compiler supports modes SD, DD, and TD, which in turn are supported if ENABLE_DECIMAL_FLOAT is defined within the compiler. That should not be defined for darwin; I'll take a look. Janis