public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Elliston <bje@au1.ibm.com>
To: Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>,
	        "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
	        Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
	        gdr@integrable-solutions.net, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: delete dead feature branches?
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1255567508.29323.0.camel@helios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0910140829390.15566@wotan.suse.de>

On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 08:33 +0200, Michael Matz wrote:

> So, why not just move them to dead-branches now, and be done with it?

OK, your argument has convinced me. :-)

Cheers,
Ben


  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-15  0:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-25 15:28 Jason Merrill
2009-09-25 15:48 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2009-09-25 18:42 ` Joseph S. Myers
2009-09-25 19:00   ` Jason Merrill
2009-09-25 19:21     ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2009-09-25 19:24       ` Richard Guenther
2009-09-25 23:45         ` Joseph S. Myers
2009-09-26  4:54           ` Source control features (Was: Re: delete dead feature branches?) Joern Rennecke
2009-10-12 14:24           ` delete dead feature branches? Paolo Bonzini
2009-10-12 21:17             ` Jason Merrill
2009-10-12 21:21               ` Andrew Pinski
2009-10-12 22:18                 ` Jason Merrill
2009-10-14  2:06                   ` Daniel Berlin
2009-10-14  3:16                     ` Joern Rennecke
2009-10-14  6:33                   ` Alexandre Oliva
2009-10-13  1:19               ` Michael Matz
2009-10-13 13:50                 ` Jason Merrill
2009-10-14  1:37                 ` Ben Elliston
2009-10-14  5:55                   ` Jason Merrill
2009-10-14  9:36                   ` Michael Matz
2009-10-15  8:17                     ` Ben Elliston [this message]
2009-10-25 18:32                   ` Gerald Pfeifer
2009-10-11 22:51   ` Ben Elliston

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1255567508.29323.0.camel@helios \
    --to=bje@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=bonzini@gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gdr@integrable-solutions.net \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=matz@suse.de \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).