From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25994 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2009 16:03:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 25910 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Nov 2009 16:03:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (HELO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com) (71.74.56.124) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:02:38 +0000 Received: from [192.168.23.10] (really [74.67.89.75]) by hrndva-comm-mta03.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20091119160236421.UXWK29910@hrndva-comm-mta03.mail.rr.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:02:36 +0000 Subject: Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions From: Steven Rostedt Reply-To: rostedt@goodmis.org To: Andrew Haley Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , LKML , Andrew Morton , Heiko Carstens , feng.tang@intel.com, Fr??d??ric Weisbecker , Peter Zijlstra , jakub@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <4B0567E0.5080803@redhat.com> References: <20091119072040.GA23579@elte.hu> <4B0567E0.5080803@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:03:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1258646552.22249.493.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00496.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 15:44 +0000, Andrew Haley wrote: > Thomas Gleixner wrote: > We're aligning the stack properly, as per the ABI requirements. Can't > you just fix the tracer? And how do we do that? The hooks that are in place have no idea of what happened before they were called? -- Steve