From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
To: Zoltan Hidvegi <hzoli@hzoli.2y.net>
Cc: "wilson@cygnus.com" <wilson@cygnus.com>,
"gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,
"bernds@redhat.com" <bernds@redhat.com>,
"Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com"
<Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com>
Subject: Re: Loop unroll fixes
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 00:05:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13100000.1002697531@warlock.codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E15pOBR-0004pQ-00@hzoli.home>
--On Friday, October 05, 2001 01:10:05 AM -0500 Zoltan Hidvegi
<hzoli@hzoli.2y.net> wrote:
>> > There are three testcases for Zoltan's 3 patches. Two of these
>> > testcases are not regressions. They fail at -O2 -funroll-loops in
>> > both gcc-2.95.2 and gcc-3.0.1. The bugs should be fixed in mainline
>> > of course, but I see no critical need to include them in gcc 3.0.2.
>
Would you please send me your most current version of these patches,
including only those that fix bugs that are regressions from GCC 2.95,
and with examples showing what bugs they fix?
I will review them, and hopefully check them in, tomorrow morning.
I anticipate those being the last changes for GCC 3.0.2.
Thank you,
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-10 0:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-13 16:35 Zoltan Hidvegi
2001-09-13 18:58 ` David Edelsohn
2001-09-13 23:50 ` Jim Wilson
2001-09-14 6:55 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-09-14 12:15 ` Joseph S. Myers
2001-09-14 16:45 ` Jim Wilson
2001-09-14 20:11 ` David Edelsohn
2001-09-14 22:23 ` Jim Wilson
2001-09-15 2:42 ` Bernd Schmidt
2001-09-14 21:16 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-09-14 9:41 ` David Edelsohn
2001-09-14 10:46 ` Bernd Schmidt
2001-09-14 11:47 ` David Edelsohn
2001-09-14 17:54 ` Jim Wilson
2001-09-14 18:35 ` David Edelsohn
2001-09-14 19:56 ` Jim Wilson
2001-09-15 2:56 ` Joseph S. Myers
2001-10-04 6:46 ` Franz Sirl
2001-10-04 7:40 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-10-04 20:46 ` Jim Wilson
2001-10-04 20:51 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-10-04 23:10 ` Zoltan Hidvegi
2001-10-10 0:05 ` Mark Mitchell [this message]
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109141957550.29416-100000@host140.cambridge.redhat.com>
2001-09-14 14:36 ` David Edelsohn
[not found] <200109142021.QAA26236@makai.watson.ibm.com>
2001-09-15 8:57 ` Bernd Schmidt
2001-09-17 13:16 ` Richard Henderson
2001-09-17 14:24 ` Joe Buck
2001-09-17 15:11 ` Richard Henderson
2001-09-17 17:22 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-09-18 2:19 ` Joseph S. Myers
2001-09-18 4:16 Richard Kenner
2001-09-18 10:47 Benjamin Kosnik
2001-09-18 11:54 mike stump
2001-09-18 12:34 ` Joseph S. Myers
2001-09-19 11:28 ` Joe Buck
2001-09-24 9:31 ` law
2001-09-18 17:36 Richard Kenner
2001-10-10 1:12 Wolfgang Bangerth
2001-10-10 1:16 ` Mark Mitchell
2001-10-10 5:14 ` Franz Sirl
2001-10-10 11:08 ` Mark Mitchell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13100000.1002697531@warlock.codesourcery.com \
--to=mark@codesourcery.com \
--cc=Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com \
--cc=bernds@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hzoli@hzoli.2y.net \
--cc=wilson@cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).