From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-173783-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10005 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2012 20:57:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 9995 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Apr 2012 20:57:04 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:56:43 +0000
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3BKuH5T009138	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:56:17 -0400
Received: from [10.36.5.225] (vpn1-5-225.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.5.225])	by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3BKuEUf030594;	Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:56:15 -0400
Subject: Re: Switching to C++ by default in 4.8
From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>,        Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com>,        Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,        Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,        Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com>,        Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>,        David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>,        Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <201204110114.16666.ebotcazou@adacore.com>
References: <4F7B356E.9080003@google.com>	 <201204102312.37159.ebotcazou@adacore.com>	 <1334093345.11195.87.camel@triegel.csb>	 <201204110114.16666.ebotcazou@adacore.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:57:00 -0000
Message-ID: <1334177773.3101.165.camel@triegel.csb>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00460.txt.bz2

On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 01:14 +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > I can't derive a definition of "token" from your example that seems
> > meaningful.  It can't be parser tokens I assume, because you split
> > GET_FIELD_DECL (but why in 2 not 3?).
> 
> FIELD_DECL is a single object, see tree.def.

So, you only know it's 2 tokens once you know all of tree.def?  I'm
aware that this is just some arbitrary example, but I believe this
actually strengthens the concern I had.