From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-51692-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1257 invoked by alias); 8 May 2002 23:25:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1246 invoked from network); 8 May 2002 23:25:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 May 2002 23:25:21 -0000
Received: from porcupine.cygnus.com (romulus.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.251])
	by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA07673
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 8 May 2002 16:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from porcupine.cygnus.com (IDENT:RT1ApWNkUwpZtb0m467+a/CuDe0W1o56@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by porcupine.cygnus.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g48NSGBi013372;
	Wed, 8 May 2002 17:28:16 -0600
Received: from porcupine.cygnus.com (law@localhost)
	by porcupine.cygnus.com (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) with ESMTP id g48NSBk3013367;
	Wed, 8 May 2002 17:28:15 -0600
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
cc: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>,
        Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: G95 Floating point arithmetics without GMP? 
Reply-To: law@redhat.com
From: law@redhat.com
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 08 May 2002 23:38:13 BST.
             <Pine.LNX.4.33.0205082336590.12048-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 18:10:00 -0000
Message-ID: <13366.1020900490@porcupine.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00620.txt.bz2

In message <Pine.LNX.4.33.0205082336590.12048-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac
.uk>, "Joseph S. Myers" writes:
 > On Wed, 8 May 2002 law@redhat.com wrote:
 > 
 > >  > > In general, do not hesitate to add tree codes to tree.def when they
 > >  > > can reasonably express a language-independent concept.  POWER_EXPR is
 > >  > > one such.
 > >  > 
 > >  > I defined it in f95-tree.def because I thought it shouldn't be in
 > >  > tree.def.
 > > It's a generic enough concept that it probably should migrate into
 > > the toplevel tree.def.
 > 
 > There used to be something called EXPON_EXPR as a placeholder in tree.def.
And your point is?

If this is something the g95 folks will need/use, then it really
belongs in tree.def.  It was probably removed because nobody actually
used it.

jeff