From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Manfred Hollstein To: Daniel.Egger@t-online.de Cc: egcs@cygnus.com Subject: Re: Debugging flags Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 07:22:00 -0000 Message-id: <13716.51728.315731.379406@saturn.hollstein.net> References: <13714.16736.633341.977475@slsvhmt> <98062616030401.00643@z2.n2480.f898.fidonet.org> X-SW-Source: 1998-06/msg00995.html On Fri, 26 June 1998, 15:57:24, Daniel.Egger@t-online.de wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jun 1998, Manfred Hollstein wrote: > > >$ env CC="{your_preferred_C_compiler}" CFLAGS="-O2" LDFLAGS=-s \ > > ${path_to_egcs_directory}/configure ... > > >and then simply call: > > >$ make bootstrap; make check; make install > > Guess what.... it won't work the way you believe it to do ... why? Because Sure it does work! Have you actually looked at the generated toplevel Makefile's CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS? They contain what you've been using at configure time and, since they are passed down via BASE_FLAGS_TO_PASS, each submake will use them, although their Makefile might contain different flags. > there are hardcoded -g's which won't get substituted. I'm trying to make > the whole process more consistent. That means we should use the same > mechanisms all over the tree. At the moment it's a whole chaos.... Not, if you were working as suggested above. > > >It's really that simple. And, don't omit `-g' from CXXFLAGS as this > >will prevent you from being able to use your favourite debugger > >looking at C++ objects whose type definitions originate from one of > >those C++ libs. > > I seldom use debuggers to debug egcs. And if I intend to do so I'll compile > it completely with debugging. For normal programs I don't need a debugable > libstdc++..... > > > [patch removed as it is not necessary] > > It may be not necessary but it would clarify things,,,, > > -- > > Servus, > Daniel > manfred