From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Manfred Hollstein To: nix@esperi.demon.co.uk Cc: egcs@cygnus.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] for latest libg++ build failures, and some warning patches Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1998 14:36:00 -0000 Message-id: <13938.25868.484258.141058@saturn.hollstein.net> References: <13938.24459.907055.491437@loki.wkstn.nix> X-SW-Source: 1998-12/msg00454.html On Sat, 12 December 1998, 12:20:27, nix@esperi.demon.co.uk wrote: > [Cc:ed to egcs-testresults as this is only likely to affect those > running `make check' over libg++] [Redirected to "egcs"] > > These are all for libg++/etc/ATD-examples/, because once I'd fixed the > implicit int-related errors, there seemed no point to not going on and > fixing the warnings. (It's not as though fixing the warnings was > exactly arduous ;) ) > > (This time I've remembered a changelog entry, too. Sorry about last > time, it slipped my mind.) > > 1998-12-12 Nix > > * ADT-examples/Patmain.cc (main): Do not rely on implicit int. > * ADT-examples/genPatkey.cc (main): Likewise. > * ADT-examples/generic-q.cc (main): Likewise. > * ADT-examples/keyhash.cc (main): Likewise, and change to void form. > * ADT-examples/tsortinp.cc (main): Likewise, and remove name of first > parameter to suppress unuse warning. > * ADT-examples/tsort.cc (main): Likewise. > (Vertex_Node::Vertex_Node,Assoc_Iter::Assoc_Iter): Order initializer > as in field declaration. > * ADT-examples/kmp.cc (kmp::kmp): Order initializer as in field > declaration. > Cool, thanks for your contribution. I'll put it into the next snapshot. manfred