* Re: [PATCH] for latest libg++ build failures, and some warning patches [not found] <13938.24459.907055.491437@loki.wkstn.nix> @ 1998-12-12 14:36 ` Manfred Hollstein 1998-12-12 15:20 ` Nix 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Manfred Hollstein @ 1998-12-12 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: nix; +Cc: egcs On Sat, 12 December 1998, 12:20:27, nix@esperi.demon.co.uk wrote: > [Cc:ed to egcs-testresults as this is only likely to affect those > running `make check' over libg++] [Redirected to "egcs"] > > These are all for libg++/etc/ATD-examples/, because once I'd fixed the > implicit int-related errors, there seemed no point to not going on and > fixing the warnings. (It's not as though fixing the warnings was > exactly arduous ;) ) > > (This time I've remembered a changelog entry, too. Sorry about last > time, it slipped my mind.) > > 1998-12-12 Nix <nix@esperi.demon.co.uk> > > * ADT-examples/Patmain.cc (main): Do not rely on implicit int. > * ADT-examples/genPatkey.cc (main): Likewise. > * ADT-examples/generic-q.cc (main): Likewise. > * ADT-examples/keyhash.cc (main): Likewise, and change to void form. > * ADT-examples/tsortinp.cc (main): Likewise, and remove name of first > parameter to suppress unuse warning. > * ADT-examples/tsort.cc (main): Likewise. > (Vertex_Node::Vertex_Node,Assoc_Iter::Assoc_Iter): Order initializer > as in field declaration. > * ADT-examples/kmp.cc (kmp::kmp): Order initializer as in field > declaration. > Cool, thanks for your contribution. I'll put it into the next snapshot. manfred ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] for latest libg++ build failures, and some warning patches 1998-12-12 14:36 ` [PATCH] for latest libg++ build failures, and some warning patches Manfred Hollstein @ 1998-12-12 15:20 ` Nix 1998-12-12 14:45 ` Manfred Hollstein 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Nix @ 1998-12-12 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: manfred, Manfred.Hollstein; +Cc: egcs Manfred Hollstein writes: > Cool, thanks for your contribution. I'll put it into the next snapshot. And, you'll never guess what, it still doesn't build, there were more of the little buggers. I've actually done a `make check' in libg++/etc this time, and that builds, so this should be all of them. Nice to see a g++ stamping on implicit int at last, I must say. 1998-12-12 Nix <nix@esperi.demon.co.uk> * benchmarks/dhrystone.cc(Proc0): Remove unused variable. (main): Do not rely on implicit int. * PlotFile3D/tPlotFile3D.cc(main): Likewise. * trie-gen/compact.cc(CompactMatrix::CompactMatrix): Order initializer as in field declaration. *** libg++/etc/benchmarks/dhrystone.cc.orig Sat Dec 12 15:17:04 1998 --- libg++/etc/benchmarks/dhrystone.cc Sat Dec 12 15:20:49 1998 *************** *** 416,421 **** --- 416,422 ---- /*end - dl */ + int main() { Proc0(); *************** *** 439,445 **** OneToFifty IntLoc1; REG OneToFifty IntLoc2; OneToFifty IntLoc3; - REG char CharLoc; REG char CharIndex; Enumeration EnumLoc; String30 String1Loc; --- 440,445 ---- *** libg++/etc/PlotFile3D/tPlotFile3D.cc.orig Sat Dec 12 15:22:07 1998 --- libg++/etc/PlotFile3D/tPlotFile3D.cc Sat Dec 12 15:22:50 1998 *************** *** 1,4 **** --- 1,5 ---- #include <PlotFile3D.h> + int main() { PlotFile3D foo("test.pl"); *** libg++/etc/trie-gen/compact.cc.orig Sat Dec 12 15:24:13 1998 --- libg++/etc/trie-gen/compact.cc Sat Dec 12 15:26:49 1998 *************** *** 57,63 **** handle matrices with fixed, but arbitrary-sized columns and rows. */ Compact_Matrix::Compact_Matrix (ITEM_TYPE *mat, int rows, int cols): ! matrix (mat), max_rows (rows), total_cols (cols), current_rows (rows) { init (rows); --- 57,63 ---- handle matrices with fixed, but arbitrary-sized columns and rows. */ Compact_Matrix::Compact_Matrix (ITEM_TYPE *mat, int rows, int cols): ! total_cols (cols), current_rows (rows), max_rows (rows), matrix (mat) { init (rows); -- `Anyone who says you can have a lot of widely dispersed people hack away on a complicated piece of code and avoid total anarchy has never managed a software project.' - Andy Tanenbaum in 1992 on comp.os.minix ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] for latest libg++ build failures, and some warning patches 1998-12-12 15:20 ` Nix @ 1998-12-12 14:45 ` Manfred Hollstein 1998-12-12 16:55 ` Nix 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Manfred Hollstein @ 1998-12-12 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: nix; +Cc: egcs On Sat, 12 December 1998, 15:36:03, nix@esperi.demon.co.uk wrote: > Manfred Hollstein writes: > > Cool, thanks for your contribution. I'll put it into the next snapshot. > > And, you'll never guess what, it still doesn't build, there were more > of the little buggers. I've actually done a `make check' in libg++/etc > this time, and that builds, so this should be all of them. Hey, what are you doing? I've built libg++ on various systems myself!?!?! > > Nice to see a g++ stamping on implicit int at last, I must say. That's a very big improvement, indeed. > > 1998-12-12 Nix <nix@esperi.demon.co.uk> > > * benchmarks/dhrystone.cc(Proc0): Remove unused variable. > (main): Do not rely on implicit int. > * PlotFile3D/tPlotFile3D.cc(main): Likewise. > * trie-gen/compact.cc(CompactMatrix::CompactMatrix): > Order initializer as in field declaration. > > *** libg++/etc/benchmarks/dhrystone.cc.orig Sat Dec 12 15:17:04 1998 > --- libg++/etc/benchmarks/dhrystone.cc Sat Dec 12 15:20:49 1998 > *************** > *** 416,421 **** > --- 416,422 ---- > > /*end - dl */ > > + int > main() > { > Proc0(); > *************** > *** 439,445 **** > OneToFifty IntLoc1; > REG OneToFifty IntLoc2; > OneToFifty IntLoc3; > - REG char CharLoc; > REG char CharIndex; > Enumeration EnumLoc; > String30 String1Loc; > --- 440,445 ---- > *** libg++/etc/PlotFile3D/tPlotFile3D.cc.orig Sat Dec 12 15:22:07 1998 > --- libg++/etc/PlotFile3D/tPlotFile3D.cc Sat Dec 12 15:22:50 1998 > *************** > *** 1,4 **** > --- 1,5 ---- > #include <PlotFile3D.h> > + int > main() > { > PlotFile3D foo("test.pl"); > *** libg++/etc/trie-gen/compact.cc.orig Sat Dec 12 15:24:13 1998 > --- libg++/etc/trie-gen/compact.cc Sat Dec 12 15:26:49 1998 > *************** > *** 57,63 **** > handle matrices with fixed, but arbitrary-sized columns and rows. */ > > Compact_Matrix::Compact_Matrix (ITEM_TYPE *mat, int rows, int cols): > ! matrix (mat), max_rows (rows), total_cols (cols), current_rows (rows) > { > init (rows); > > --- 57,63 ---- > handle matrices with fixed, but arbitrary-sized columns and rows. */ > > Compact_Matrix::Compact_Matrix (ITEM_TYPE *mat, int rows, int cols): > ! total_cols (cols), current_rows (rows), max_rows (rows), matrix (mat) > { > init (rows); > > > > -- > `Anyone who says you can have a lot of widely dispersed people hack > away on a complicated piece of code and avoid total anarchy has never > managed a software project.' - Andy Tanenbaum in 1992 on comp.os.minix > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] for latest libg++ build failures, and some warning patches 1998-12-12 14:45 ` Manfred Hollstein @ 1998-12-12 16:55 ` Nix 1998-12-13 7:28 ` Manfred Hollstein 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Nix @ 1998-12-12 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: manfred, Manfred.Hollstein; +Cc: egcs Manfred Hollstein writes: > On Sat, 12 December 1998, 15:36:03, nix@esperi.demon.co.uk wrote: > > > Manfred Hollstein writes: > > > Cool, thanks for your contribution. I'll put it into the next snapshot. > > > > And, you'll never guess what, it still doesn't build, there were more > > of the little buggers. I've actually done a `make check' in libg++/etc > > this time, and that builds, so this should be all of them. > > Hey, what are you doing? I've built libg++ on various systems myself!?!?! Fatal: Brain underflow: Misphrased. s/it still doesn't build/it still doesn't `make check' -- `Anyone who says you can have a lot of widely dispersed people hack away on a complicated piece of code and avoid total anarchy has never managed a software project.' - Andy Tanenbaum in 1992 on comp.os.minix ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] for latest libg++ build failures, and some warning patches 1998-12-12 16:55 ` Nix @ 1998-12-13 7:28 ` Manfred Hollstein 1998-12-13 8:09 ` Nix 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Manfred Hollstein @ 1998-12-13 7:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: nix; +Cc: egcs On Sat, 12 December 1998, 21:00:07, nix@esperi.demon.co.uk wrote: > Manfred Hollstein writes: > > On Sat, 12 December 1998, 15:36:03, nix@esperi.demon.co.uk wrote: > > > > > Manfred Hollstein writes: > > > > Cool, thanks for your contribution. I'll put it into the next snapshot. > > > > > > And, you'll never guess what, it still doesn't build, there were more > > > of the little buggers. I've actually done a `make check' in libg++/etc > > > this time, and that builds, so this should be all of them. > > > > Hey, what are you doing? I've built libg++ on various systems myself!?!?! > > Fatal: Brain underflow: Misphrased. > > s/it still doesn't build/it still doesn't `make check' OK, I was unclear, too; but, AFAIR you're building/checking on i586-pc-linux-gnu, right? This is actually the same configuration that I built/checked on recently without any problems?!?!? manfred > > -- > `Anyone who says you can have a lot of widely dispersed people hack > away on a complicated piece of code and avoid total anarchy has never > managed a software project.' - Andy Tanenbaum in 1992 on comp.os.minix > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] for latest libg++ build failures, and some warning patches 1998-12-13 7:28 ` Manfred Hollstein @ 1998-12-13 8:09 ` Nix 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Nix @ 1998-12-13 8:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: manfred, Manfred.Hollstein; +Cc: egcs Manfred Hollstein writes: > > s/it still doesn't build/it still doesn't `make check' > > OK, I was unclear, too; but, AFAIR you're building/checking on i586-pc-linux-gnu, > right? This is actually the same configuration that I built/checked on recently > without any problems?!?!? The implicit int-related errors only started appearing *after* the last snapshot; I'm using the mainline tree, last updated at 12/12/98, 15:36. This was the first time I saw this symptom. -- `Anyone who says you can have a lot of widely dispersed people hack away on a complicated piece of code and avoid total anarchy has never managed a software project.' - Andy Tanenbaum in 1992 on comp.os.minix ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1998-12-13 8:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <13938.24459.907055.491437@loki.wkstn.nix>
1998-12-12 14:36 ` [PATCH] for latest libg++ build failures, and some warning patches Manfred Hollstein
1998-12-12 15:20 ` Nix
1998-12-12 14:45 ` Manfred Hollstein
1998-12-12 16:55 ` Nix
1998-12-13 7:28 ` Manfred Hollstein
1998-12-13 8:09 ` Nix
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).