From: Steve Ellcey <sellcey@cavium.com>
To: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>, Alan.Haward@arm.com
Cc: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,
Francesco Petrogalli <Francesco.Petrogalli@arm.com>,
James Greenhalgh <James.Greenhalgh@arm.com>,
"Sekhar, Ashwin" <Ashwin.Sekhar@cavium.com>,
gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,
Marcus Shawcroft <Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [Aarch64] Vector Function Application Binary Interface Specification for OpenMP
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 17:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1527184223.22014.13.camel@cavium.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a7sznw5c.fsf@linaro.org>
On Wed, 2018-05-16 at 22:11 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>Â
> TARGET_HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED is the only current way
> of saying that an rtl instruction preserves the low part of a
> register but clobbers the high part.  We would need something like
> Alan H's CLOBBER_HIGH patches to do it using explicit clobbers.
>
> Another approach would be to piggy-back on the -fipa-ra
> infrastructure
> and record that vector PCS functions only clobber Q0-Q7.  If -fipa-ra
> knows that a function doesn't clobber Q8-Q15 then that should
> override
> TARGET_HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED.  (I'm not sure whether it does
> in practice, but it should :-)Â Â And if it doesn't that's a bug that's
> worth fixing for its own sake.)
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
Alan,
I have been looking at your CLOBBER_HIGH patches to see if they
might be helpful in implementing the ARM SIMD Vector ABI in GCC.
I have also been looking at the -fipa-ra flag and how it works.
I was wondering if you considered using the ipa-ra infrastructure
for the SVE work that you are currently trying to support withÂ
the CLOBBER_HIGH macro?
My current thought for the ABI work is to mark all the floating
point / vector registers as caller saved (the lower half of V8-V15
are currently callee saved) and remove
TARGET_HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED.
This should work but would be inefficient.
The next step would be to split get_call_reg_set_usage up into
two functions so that I don't have to pass in a default set of
registers.  One function would return call_used_reg_set by
default (but could return a smaller set if it had actual used
register information) and the other would return regs_invalidated
by_call by default (but could also return a smaller set).
Next I would add a 'largest mode used' array to call_cgraph_rtl_info
structure in addition to the current function_used_regs register
set.
Then I could turn the get_call_reg_set_usage replacement functions
into target specific functions and with the information in the
call_cgraph_rtl_info structure and any simd attribute information on
a function I could modify what registers are really being used/invalidated
without being saved.
If the called function only uses the bottom half of a register it would not
be marked as used/invalidated.  If it uses the entire register and the
function is not marked as simd, then the register would marked as
used/invalidated.  If the function was marked as simd the register would not
be marked because a simd function would save both the upper and lower halves
of a callee saved register (whereas a non simd function would only save the
lower half).
Does this sound like something that could be used in place of yourÂ
CLOBBER_HIGH patch?
Steve Ellcey
sellcey@cavium.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-24 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-09 21:47 Steve Ellcey
2018-05-15 18:29 ` Francesco Petrogalli
2018-05-16 16:21 ` Steve Ellcey
2018-05-16 16:30 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2018-05-16 17:30 ` Steve Ellcey
2018-05-16 21:11 ` Richard Sandiford
2018-05-24 17:50 ` Steve Ellcey [this message]
2018-05-26 10:09 ` Richard Sandiford
2018-05-26 22:13 ` Segher Boessenkool
2018-05-27 15:59 ` Jeff Law
2018-05-29 10:06 ` Richard Sandiford
2018-05-31 10:39 ` Alan Hayward
2018-06-12 3:11 ` Jeff Law
2018-06-11 23:06 ` Jeff Law
2018-07-02 18:16 ` Francesco Petrogalli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-03-15 9:50 Sekhar, Ashwin
2017-03-17 14:02 ` James Greenhalgh
2017-03-20 4:30 ` Sekhar, Ashwin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1527184223.22014.13.camel@cavium.com \
--to=sellcey@cavium.com \
--cc=Alan.Haward@arm.com \
--cc=Ashwin.Sekhar@cavium.com \
--cc=Francesco.Petrogalli@arm.com \
--cc=James.Greenhalgh@arm.com \
--cc=Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=richard.sandiford@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).