From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-42566-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16737 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2001 17:00:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15276 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2001 16:59:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.equallogic.com) (65.170.102.10)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2001 16:59:08 -0000
Received: from deneb.dev.equallogic.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by cygnus.equallogic.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fBAGwqU14220;
	Mon, 10 Dec 2001 11:58:52 -0500
Received: from pkoning.dev.equallogic.com.equallogic.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by deneb.dev.equallogic.com (8.11.6/8.11.2) with SMTP id fBAGwq410485;
	Mon, 10 Dec 2001 11:58:52 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15380.59851.879850.25963@pkoning.dev.equallogic.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:09:00 -0000
From: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>
To: torvalds@transmeta.com
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Optimizations on long long multiply/divide on PowerPC32 don't work
Newsgroups: linux.egcs
References: <3C115A53.2070206@acm.org>
	<200112100658.fBA6wEh13767@penguin.transmeta.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 11) "Carlsbad Caverns" XEmacs Lucid
X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00502.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Linus" == Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> writes:

 Linus> In article <20011207164904.C16375@redhat.com> you write:
 >> On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 06:09:55PM -0600, Corey Minyard wrote:
 >>> 1) Add __divdi3 to the linux kernel.  I don't really think this
 >>> is a good idea, and it shouldn't be required.
 >>  Yes it should.  I've long considered it a bug that Linux didn't
 >> link against libgcc.

 Linus> ...Not linking against libgcc has found several problems in gcc.
 Linus> Ranging from missing totally obvious optimizations...

Does that mean that Linux isn't expected to build if you disable
optimization?  That seems strange, considering that debugging with gdb
is often easier with -O0.

   paul