From: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>
To: mark@codesourcery.com
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Installation proposal
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 10:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15485.10754.762686.888104@pkoning.dev.equallogic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11560000.1014832588@warlock.codesourcery.com>
As a novice at GCC hackery I don't have any real opinion about the
mechanics you're proposing. But the idea sounds sensible.
There may be another benefit, perhaps... if you actually do the more
complex change of updating where the outputs go, then in stage 2 the
invocations of the newly built compiler would look more like regular
invocations rather than the somewhat messy ones you have now. It's
possible that a bunch of the "this compiler can't create binaries"
failures that you tend to see -- especially in cross-builds if you
don't know all the right magic words -- will go away. That would be a
Good Thing.
paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-27 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-27 10:11 Mark Mitchell
2002-02-27 10:25 ` H . J . Lu
2002-02-27 10:26 ` David Edelsohn
2002-02-27 10:59 ` Jim Wilson
2002-02-27 13:05 ` Michael Meissner
2002-02-27 10:50 ` Paul Koning [this message]
2002-02-27 11:02 ` Stan Shebs
2002-02-27 11:04 ` Joseph S. Myers
2002-02-27 11:25 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-02-27 12:10 ` Joseph S. Myers
2002-02-27 11:05 ` Joel Sherrill
2002-02-27 11:53 ` Joseph S. Myers
2002-02-27 11:07 ` Tom Tromey
2002-02-27 11:26 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-02-27 14:55 ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-27 17:38 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-02-27 17:45 ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-27 18:27 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-02-28 0:04 ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-28 2:02 ` Joseph S. Myers
2002-02-28 2:25 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-02-27 11:13 ` Laurent Guerby
2002-02-27 12:11 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-02-27 12:17 ` Jim Wilson
2002-02-27 14:43 ` Laurent Guerby
2002-02-27 12:52 ` Neil Booth
2002-02-27 11:18 ` Jim Wilson
2002-02-27 14:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-02-27 17:18 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-02-27 17:20 ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-27 17:59 ` Mark Mitchell
[not found] ` <mailpost.1014859095.10690@news-sj1-1>
2002-02-27 18:16 ` cgd
2002-02-27 11:23 ` Per Bothner
2002-02-28 1:39 ` Akim Demaille
2002-02-27 14:56 ` Nathan Sidwell
2002-02-27 16:11 ` Loren James Rittle
2002-02-27 17:47 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-02-27 18:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-02-28 14:06 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-02-27 18:33 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-02-28 9:18 ` Per Bothner
2002-02-28 9:42 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-02-28 1:13 ` Akim Demaille
2002-02-27 10:48 Mark Mitchell
2002-02-27 11:07 Benjamin Kosnik
2002-02-27 13:22 mike stump
2002-02-28 11:51 mike stump
2002-02-28 12:56 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-02-28 14:04 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-02-28 14:28 ` Per Bothner
2002-02-28 16:32 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15485.10754.762686.888104@pkoning.dev.equallogic.com \
--to=pkoning@equallogic.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).