From: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>
To: phil@jaj.com
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 07:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15548.11379.246000.856412@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020415230300.B15940@disaster.basement.lan>
Excerpt of message (sent 15 April 2002) by Phil Edwards:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:42:59PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe have something like "if you're just going to be building a native
> > > compiler for our 3 most popular platforms, grab these tiny tarballs,
> > > else grab the whole thing."
> >
> > Old news for DJGPP. Our source distributions are stripped of most of
> > the files that aren't used for a DJGPP native build. The files are
> > about 60% of their original size that way.
>
> I thought about this some more while in the shower. Maybe downloading a
> release should involve:
>
> 1. "Download this tar.bz2 file. It is the core C compiler and middle-end
> pieces, with no other language support, and no back-end support."
>
> 2. "Optionally, download these tarballs to support additional languages,
> such as C++, FORTRAN, Java, treelang, and Brainfunct."
>
> 3. "Download the config-*.tar.bz2 file(s) for the platform(s) you wish
> to support. At least one platform backend file must be downloaded."
I'm not convinced the config/* subtree is big enough to make that much
extra complexity worth dealing with.
If you really want to have a "trimmed config" tarball, I'd suggest
splitting it just two ways: the "most popular targets" (which are in
the core C tarball) and the "all targets" supplemental tarball.
Then all that's left is to live through the debate about what's "most
popular". :-)
paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-16 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20020412194555.GD320@codesourcery.com.suse.lists.egcs-patches>
2002-04-14 15:18 ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-14 15:29 ` Kevin Handy
2002-04-14 23:24 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-04-15 1:21 ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-15 6:35 ` Paul Koning
2002-04-15 7:46 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-15 8:07 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-15 8:16 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-15 12:59 ` mike stump
2002-04-15 13:23 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-16 2:37 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-04-16 22:40 ` David O'Brien
2002-04-15 10:45 ` Daniel Egger
2002-04-15 12:21 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-04-15 11:56 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-04-15 16:49 ` Richard Henderson
2002-04-15 8:20 ` Lars Brinkhoff
2002-04-15 8:33 ` Alan Lehotsky
2002-04-15 10:06 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-04-15 10:42 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-15 12:47 ` Janis Johnson
2002-04-25 16:56 ` Jason Merrill
2002-04-15 18:50 ` Stan Shebs
2002-04-16 9:39 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-04-16 9:59 ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2002-04-18 9:29 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-04-18 10:13 ` Paul Koning
2002-04-19 12:36 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-04-15 12:50 ` mike stump
2002-04-15 19:31 ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-15 19:46 ` DJ Delorie
2002-04-15 20:08 ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-15 23:06 ` DJ Delorie
2002-04-16 7:01 ` Paul Koning [this message]
2002-04-15 23:24 ` Neil Booth
2002-04-16 6:08 ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-17 18:13 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-04-17 19:10 ` DJ Delorie
2002-04-17 20:26 ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-19 12:46 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-04-15 0:31 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-04-15 17:43 ` Stan Shebs
2002-04-15 17:07 ` David O'Brien
2002-04-16 0:44 ` Douglas B. Rupp
2002-04-16 4:32 ` Joel Sherrill
2002-04-16 7:08 ` Paul Koning
2002-04-16 7:22 ` Joel Sherrill
2002-04-16 3:41 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-04-16 6:30 ` Nick Burrett
2002-04-15 8:13 Robert Dewar
2002-04-15 9:28 Richard Kenner
2002-04-15 13:03 Robert Dewar
2002-04-16 8:46 Dana, Eric
2002-04-16 9:21 ` 'Zack Weinberg'
2002-04-16 9:39 ` Michael Matz
2002-04-16 12:57 Dana, Eric
2002-04-26 8:46 Dana, Eric
2002-04-26 9:18 ` Janis Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15548.11379.246000.856412@gargle.gargle.HOWL \
--to=pkoning@equallogic.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=phil@jaj.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).