public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>
To: kaih@khms.westfalen.de
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 10:13:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15550.64447.973000.751429@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CBF0C24.27839.115C81C1@localhost>

Excerpt of message (sent 18 April 2002) by Kai Henningsen:
> On 15 Apr 2002 at 10:05, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> 
> > I would like to avoid getting into a controversial policy debate two
> > weeks before 3.1 is released.  Therefore, I think that in 3.1 we
> > should deprecate only those targets that have no constituents at all.
> > For 3.2 we can talk about doing a broader sweep.
> 
> For 3.2, how about a (published enough in advance, of course) policy 
> that everything goes for which there isn't either a "successful 
> built" report or submitted testresults for the last N releases (or 
> possibly N months)?

Interesting notion.  Does that depend on the existence of a simulator
for the target?  (is there an MMIX simulator??)

> For a later version, that could then be strengthened to at least a 
> successful bootstrap.

That doesn't work for embedded targets, which can't be bootstrapped,
they can only be crosscompilers.
 
	paul

  reply	other threads:[~2002-04-18 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20020412194555.GD320@codesourcery.com.suse.lists.egcs-patches>
2002-04-14 15:18 ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-14 15:29   ` Kevin Handy
2002-04-14 23:24     ` Zack Weinberg
2002-04-15  1:21       ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-15  6:35       ` Paul Koning
2002-04-15  7:46     ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-15  8:07       ` David S. Miller
2002-04-15  8:16         ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-15 12:59           ` mike stump
2002-04-15 13:23             ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-16  2:37           ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-04-16 22:40             ` David O'Brien
2002-04-15 10:45         ` Daniel Egger
2002-04-15 12:21           ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-04-15 11:56         ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-04-15 16:49         ` Richard Henderson
2002-04-15  8:20       ` Lars Brinkhoff
2002-04-15  8:33       ` Alan Lehotsky
2002-04-15 10:06       ` Zack Weinberg
2002-04-15 10:42         ` Mark Mitchell
2002-04-15 12:47         ` Janis Johnson
2002-04-25 16:56           ` Jason Merrill
2002-04-15 18:50         ` Stan Shebs
2002-04-16  9:39           ` Zack Weinberg
2002-04-16  9:59             ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2002-04-18  9:29         ` Kai Henningsen
2002-04-18 10:13           ` Paul Koning [this message]
2002-04-19 12:36             ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-04-15 12:50       ` mike stump
2002-04-15 19:31       ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-15 19:46         ` DJ Delorie
2002-04-15 20:08           ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-15 23:06             ` DJ Delorie
2002-04-16  7:01             ` Paul Koning
2002-04-15 23:24         ` Neil Booth
2002-04-16  6:08           ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-17 18:13         ` Zack Weinberg
2002-04-17 19:10           ` DJ Delorie
2002-04-17 20:26             ` Phil Edwards
2002-04-19 12:46           ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2002-04-15  0:31   ` Zack Weinberg
2002-04-15 17:43     ` Stan Shebs
2002-04-15 17:07   ` David O'Brien
2002-04-16  0:44     ` Douglas B. Rupp
2002-04-16  4:32     ` Joel Sherrill
2002-04-16  7:08       ` Paul Koning
2002-04-16  7:22         ` Joel Sherrill
2002-04-16  3:41 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-04-16  6:30   ` Nick Burrett
2002-04-15  8:13 Robert Dewar
2002-04-15  9:28 Richard Kenner
2002-04-15 13:03 Robert Dewar
2002-04-16  8:46 Dana, Eric
2002-04-16  9:21 ` 'Zack Weinberg'
2002-04-16  9:39 ` Michael Matz
2002-04-16 12:57 Dana, Eric
2002-04-26  8:46 Dana, Eric
2002-04-26  9:18 ` Janis Johnson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15550.64447.973000.751429@gargle.gargle.HOWL \
    --to=pkoning@equallogic.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=kaih@khms.westfalen.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).