From: Andrew Haley <aph@cambridge.redhat.com>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>, Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU>,
"gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,
"java@gcc.gnu.org" <java@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Java inliner
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 11:21:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15648.40350.493795.623862@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5620000.1023887664@warlock.codesourcery.com>
Mark Mitchell writes:
>
> The current inliner already has mechanisms for language-specific
> extensions. If those can be used, or it can be easily extended so that
> they can be used, great.
Well I tried, I really did. But the inliner we have at the moment
uses C-private tree nodes to such an extent that I think it isn't
possible without totally messing up the code. I could replace every
occurrence of these nodes with macros or function pointers, but the
result would not be pretty. The real answer in the long term is, of
course, SIMPLE.
Andrew.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-01 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-11 7:00 Andrew Haley
2002-06-11 7:25 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-06-11 7:26 ` Andrew Haley
2002-06-11 7:56 ` Fergus Henderson
2002-06-11 9:18 ` Andrew Haley
2002-06-11 9:49 ` Joe Buck
2002-06-11 10:59 ` Andrew Haley
2002-06-11 11:29 ` Diego Novillo
2002-06-11 22:36 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-06-12 2:24 ` Per Bothner
2002-06-12 4:47 ` Andrew Haley
2002-06-12 6:38 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-06-12 8:45 ` Andrew Haley
2002-06-12 9:13 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-06-12 9:28 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-07-01 11:21 ` Andrew Haley [this message]
2002-07-01 11:29 ` Andrew Haley
2002-07-01 11:56 ` RFC: " Daniel Berlin
2002-07-01 11:58 ` Andrew Haley
2002-07-10 5:16 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-07-10 7:08 ` Andrew Haley
2002-07-10 7:10 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-07-10 7:32 ` Andrew Haley
2002-07-10 13:41 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-07-30 9:43 ` Andrew Haley
2002-08-12 10:37 ` Tom Tromey
2002-08-12 10:42 ` Andrew Haley
2002-07-10 9:00 ` Tom Tromey
2002-06-11 8:39 ` profiling shared libraries Taha Mannan Jiruwala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15648.40350.493795.623862@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com \
--to=aph@cambridge.redhat.com \
--cc=fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=java@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
--cc=per@bothner.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).