From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Haley <aph@cambridge.redhat.com>
To: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, "java@gcc.gnu.org" <java@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Java inliner
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:42:00 -0000
Message-id: <15703.62324.8587.4555@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
References: <15648.40350.493795.623862@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207011455550.20102-100000@dberlin.org> <15648.42609.739440.682415@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <orr8ici2sh.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <15659.62226.717520.170250@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <or4rf7j05w.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <15660.6835.58381.407065@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <or3cur37ee.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <15686.39279.721250.392094@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <87u1m0ht41.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-08/msg00666.html

Tom Tromey writes:
 > >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@cambridge.redhat.com> writes:
 > 
 > Andrew> Okay, here it is.  Looks like you were right.
 > Andrew> [ new tree inliner that works with gcj ]
 > 
 > I just got back from vacation, and I haven't seen any reply to
 > Andrew's post.
 > 
 > I'd like to see this, or Andrew's earlier inlining patch, go in.  Can
 > someone review it?

BTW, Jeff Sturm submitted a minor bug fix and a couple of additions to
my patch.  I could re-submit incorporating his changes, but I don't
think it's necessary to do so for my patch to be reviewed.

Andrew.