From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rainer Orth <ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
To: "Anthony Feick" <afeick@hotmail.com>
Cc: rup@kanat.pair.com, rschiele@uni-mannheim.de, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, jakub@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: gcc 3.2 on Solaris 8 (libgcc_s.so problem)
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 08:39:00 -0000
Message-id: <15714.25241.612515.287173@xayide.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
References: <F2635HwiyGmiJjpTI970001ec69@hotmail.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-08/msg01183.html

Anthony Feick writes:

> Are you sure these are the 32 bit libraries?  I tried just moving them into 
> local/lib, but libgcc_s.so.1 segfaults instantly.

pretty much so: what does `file' say about them?

> I tried this:
> 
> int main(void)
> {
>    return 0;
> }
> 
> When I debug it in gdb I get this:
> 
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> __register_frame_info_bases (begin=0xff2b0000, ob=0xff2b0000, tbase=0x0, 
> dbase=0x0)
>     at ../../gcc-3.2/gcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c:83
> 83        ob->tbase = tbase;
> Current language:  auto; currently c

Did you configure/build with binutils 2.13?  I recall reports that these
totally broke gcc 3.2.  I've personally avoided GNU binutils on Solaris 2,
and didn't ever have problems with this approach.

	Rainer