From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-72011-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 24781 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2003 08:46:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24772 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2003 08:45:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Apr 2003 08:45:57 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3G8jvD00758;
	Wed, 16 Apr 2003 04:45:57 -0400
Received: from redhat.com (IDENT:N1izB+iFzdBvitlCCnIUvPARaYfQc4Ao@vpn50-29.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.29])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3G8juq15508;
	Wed, 16 Apr 2003 04:45:56 -0400
Received: (from aph@localhost)
	by redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) id h3G8jsG15882;
	Wed, 16 Apr 2003 09:45:54 +0100
From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16029.6210.96160.928149@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 10:42:00 -0000
To: "Mark Mitchell" <mark@codesourcery.com>,
   "Gabriel Dos Reis" <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>, <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Converting to ISO C89
In-Reply-To: <16026.30975.545273.956084@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
References: <200303250642.h2P6gZ4r025932@doubledemon.codesourcery.com>
	<16021.32483.528431.369019@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
	<1049992269.27573.3.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com>
	<m3brzbvpfn.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>
	<003101c3022d$41bc4ff0$6900a8c0@minax>
	<16026.30975.545273.956084@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00754.txt.bz2

Andrew Haley writes:
 > Mark Mitchell writes:
 >  > Good point.
 >  > 
 >  > Given that, I'd prefer not to see ISO C89 patches making their way into the
 >  > 3.3 branch.  That seems like more disruption than we need at this point.
 > 
 > Too late.  I've done it now, with http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-03/msg01532.html.
 > 
 > We can convert that patch to K&R if needs be.  It'll only take ten minutes to do that.

Should I convert this patch to K%R?

Andrew.