From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-74587-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11917 invoked by alias); 19 May 2003 14:51:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11870 invoked from network); 19 May 2003 14:51:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.equallogic.com) (65.170.102.10)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 May 2003 14:51:18 -0000
Received: from cygnus.equallogic.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by cygnus.equallogic.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4JEpHr01492
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 19 May 2003 10:51:17 -0400
Received: from deneb.dev.equallogic.com (deneb.dev.equallogic.com [172.16.1.99])
	by cygnus.equallogic.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4JEpHu01477;
	Mon, 19 May 2003 10:51:17 -0400
Received: from pkoning.dev.equallogic.com.equallogic.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by deneb.dev.equallogic.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4JEpGe15699;
	Mon, 19 May 2003 10:51:17 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16072.61284.731179.840269@pkoning.dev.equallogic.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 14:55:00 -0000
From: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>
To: gdr@integrable-solutions.net
Cc: zack@codesourcery.com, neil@daikokuya.co.uk, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Warning for trigraphs in comment?
References: <m34r3sxw7j.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>
	<20030518193113.GC13596@daikokuya.co.uk>
	<m3n0hjxwgo.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>
	<16072.55751.300819.237661@pkoning.dev.equallogic.com>
	<871xyvf1pu.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>
	<16072.60344.109869.222568@pkoning.dev.equallogic.com>
	<m33cjbuhbp.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg01758.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Gabriel" == Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> writes:

 Gabriel> Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com> writes:

 >> Oh.  So it looks like what's needed is to have -ansi NOT imply
 >> -trigraphs.

 Gabriel> I'm not sure we are talking about the same thing.

I was responding to your comment that "the real fix is to remove
trigraphs from the standard".  Indeed it is, but until then, making it
maximally hard to turn them on would be a start.

 Gabriel> What is happening with current GCC in production use is that
 Gabriel> GCC choosed NOT to warn for trigraphs in comment even if
 Gabriel> -Wtrigraph.

I'm guessing that you didn't say -trigraph, but rather that you got it
implicitly because you said -ansi.  That's where my suggestion came
from.

	paul