From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-89554-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 32747 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2004 15:27:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32739 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2004 15:27:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta05-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.45)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Jan 2004 15:27:11 -0000
Received: from cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com ([81.96.64.123])
          by mta05-svc.ntlworld.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with ESMTP
          id <20040120152645.DDNP5350.mta05-svc.ntlworld.com@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
          for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:26:45 +0000
Received: from redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0KFR2nB021834;
	Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:27:03 GMT
Received: (from aph@localhost)
	by redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0KFR0Pt021830;
	Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:27:00 GMT
From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16397.18628.787176.859304@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:27:00 -0000
To: Scott Robert Ladd <coyote@coyotegulch.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline
In-Reply-To: <400D4696.4090103@coyotegulch.com>
References: <1074298740.3147.79.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com>
	<1074366070.3537.36.camel@minax.codesourcery.com>
	<200401200139.i0K1dsUu019678@caip.rutgers.edu>
	<m31xpv1j23.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>
	<400D4696.4090103@coyotegulch.com>
X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01509.txt.bz2

Scott Robert Ladd writes:
 > Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
 > > "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> writes:
 > > 
 > > | I also agree with Joe that we should consider bumping to version 4.0
 > > | after we merge tree-ssa:
 > > | http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-01/msg01408.html
 > > | I think it properly communicates the amount of change under the hood
 > > | to users.
 > > 
 > > Seconded.
 > 
 > Thirded. ;)
 > 
 > > Merging tree-ssa into mainline, renaming the whole thing as the next
 > > GCC-4.x.y series and allowing time for other front-ends to adjust 
 > > and GCC developers to adjust to the new framework is, I believe, an
 > > action we should seriously consider.  

>From the Java point of view, merging tree-ssa into mainline would make
my task easier.  I care rather less about whether we call it 3.5 or
4.0.

Andrew.