From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-64790-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1957 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2002 23:29:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1935 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2002 23:29:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out2.apple.com) (17.254.0.51)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 16 Dec 2002 23:29:33 -0000
Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (A17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225])
	by mail-out2.apple.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id gBGNSWI07898;
	Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:28:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scv1.apple.com (scv1.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com
 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.5) with ESMTP id <T5f345e48fd118064e13c8@mailgate1.apple.com>;
 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:28:07 -0800
Received: from apple.com (johada.apple.com [17.201.20.167])
	by scv1.apple.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id gBGNSVs16926;
	Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:28:31 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:40:00 -0000
Subject: Re: basic-improvements merge status
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551)
Cc: Dale Johannesen <dalej@apple.com>, David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>,
   Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
   libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, rth@cygnus.com
To: Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
From: Dale Johannesen <dalej@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <20021216224439.GF3138@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
Message-Id: <164D0268-114E-11D7-8A5A-003065C86F94@apple.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00964.txt.bz2


On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 02:44  PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> On C99 and C++ it is always valid as runtime is required to have it 
> (and
> thats why libstdc++ does it).

According to the C99 standard, this is right, but GCC does not control 
the
runtime libraries.  What should the behavior of -std=c99 be, when 
generating code
for a target with non-C99-conformant libraries?