From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeffrey A Law To: Donn Terry Cc: egcs@egcs.cygnus.com Subject: Re: egcs-1.2 stuff Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 23:43:00 -0000 Message-id: <1650.921912901@upchuck> In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 19 Mar 1999 14:35:21 MST. < 36F2C319.949610F6@interix.com > References: <36F2C319.949610F6@interix.com> X-SW-Source: 1999-03/msg00683.html In message < 36F2C319.949610F6@interix.com >you write: > So what is the status of things sitting in your queue of patches? > (Obviously, I'm interested in the status of Mumit's Interix patches > at the moment.) I'm working to resolve them as quickly as I can. I've stated more than once that if you're unhappy with the rate at which your patches are addressed that you can/should work with one of the other maintainers to get them resolved. That's the whole point behind having multiple maintainers. Interix isn't that high of a priority relative to many of the other patches in my queue. Sorry. It's simply a matter of priorities. jeff From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeffrey A Law To: Donn Terry Cc: egcs@egcs.cygnus.com Subject: Re: egcs-1.2 stuff Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 23:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1650.921912901@upchuck> References: <36F2C319.949610F6@interix.com> X-SW-Source: 1999-03n/msg00688.html Message-ID: <19990331234600.Dkjy45f7OzLitRzutBmCnZPTDs5zEF1eJHsCTUcmHII@z> In message < 36F2C319.949610F6@interix.com >you write: > So what is the status of things sitting in your queue of patches? > (Obviously, I'm interested in the status of Mumit's Interix patches > at the moment.) I'm working to resolve them as quickly as I can. I've stated more than once that if you're unhappy with the rate at which your patches are addressed that you can/should work with one of the other maintainers to get them resolved. That's the whole point behind having multiple maintainers. Interix isn't that high of a priority relative to many of the other patches in my queue. Sorry. It's simply a matter of priorities. jeff