From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13090 invoked by alias); 23 May 2003 14:59:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13083 invoked from network); 23 May 2003 14:59:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dellpi.pinski.fam) (216.196.136.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 May 2003 14:59:22 -0000 Received: from physics.uc.edu (IDENT:pinskia@localhost.pinski.fam [127.0.0.1]) by dellpi.pinski.fam (8.12.2/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h4NEx9MJ010358; Fri, 23 May 2003 10:59:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 14:59:00 -0000 Subject: Re: Bugzilla and gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) Cc: Andrew Pinski , Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org To: Jason Thorpe From: Andrew Pinski In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <167DF63A-8D2F-11D7-BA60-000393A6D2F2@physics.uc.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02087.txt.bz2 Think it should be the opposite as it was under GNAT. Thanks, Andrew Pinski On Friday, May 23, 2003, at 09:59 US/Eastern, Jason Thorpe wrote: > > On Friday, May 23, 2003, at 03:26 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > >> I'd like to suggest that gcc-bugs be used only for NEW reports being >> entered into bugzilla, and that some other list (maybe the currently >> defunct gcc-prs) be used for all audit-trail mailings and follow-ups. > > I think this is a great idea. It would certainly help me keep up with > it. > > -- Jason R. Thorpe > > >