public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
To: Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>, "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: RE: pure and const functions
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:11:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <169790000.1019847451@gandalf.codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0204261145220.2837-100000@nondot.org>



--On Friday, April 26, 2002 11:50:07 AM -0500 Chris Lattner 
<sabre@nondot.org> wrote:

>
>> int fib(int n) {
>>   if (n==0 || n==1) return n;
>>   return fib(n-1) + fib(n-2);
>> }
>
>> According to the definitions given above, this function is const,
>> but not total, because it does not return for negative n.
>
> While this is true in a practical sense, given infinite resources, this is
> certainly not the case.  Assuming you had a whole lot of stack space and
> bunch of time, the negative values for 'n' would wrap around to positive
> values.  Eventually it would get to 1 and terminate.

Actually, C does not guarantee that negative values wrap around to
positive values.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-04-26 19:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-26 10:17 Chris Lattner
2002-04-26 10:21 ` Kris Warkentin
2002-04-26 10:30   ` Chris Lattner
2002-04-26 10:34     ` Magnus Fromreide
2002-04-26 10:35       ` Chris Lattner
2002-04-26 10:59         ` Magnus Fromreide
2002-04-26 11:03           ` Chris Lattner
2002-04-26 11:27             ` Magnus Fromreide
2002-04-26 12:49           ` Russ Allbery
2002-04-26 10:36     ` Kris Warkentin
2002-04-26 10:46       ` Chris Lattner
2002-04-26 10:26 ` Tim Hollebeek
2002-04-26 10:30   ` Chris Lattner
2002-04-26 10:56     ` Zack Weinberg
2002-04-26 11:01       ` Chris Lattner
2002-08-30 23:02         ` Zack Weinberg
2002-04-26 10:56     ` Tony Finch
2002-04-26 12:11 ` Mark Mitchell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-29 17:25 John Wehle
2002-04-29  9:29 Robert Dewar
2002-04-29  9:34 ` Chris Lattner
2002-04-29  8:30 Robert Dewar
2002-04-29  8:57 ` Chris Lattner
2002-04-29  8:30 Chris Lattner
2002-04-29  9:23 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-04-29  9:52   ` Chris Lattner
2002-04-29  9:58   ` Mark Dettinger
2002-04-29  5:18 Robert Dewar
2002-04-29  5:44 ` Mark Dettinger
2002-04-29  3:59 Mark Dettinger
2002-04-26  5:16 Mark Dettinger
2002-04-26 11:20 ` Joseph S. Myers
2002-04-26 12:59 ` Jakub Jelinek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=169790000.1019847451@gandalf.codesourcery.com \
    --to=mark@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=sabre@nondot.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).