From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30053 invoked by alias); 1 May 2005 09:16:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29908 invoked from network); 1 May 2005 09:16:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta08-winn.mailhost.ntl.com) (212.250.162.16) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 May 2005 09:16:02 -0000 Received: from aamta05-winn.mailhost.ntl.com ([212.250.162.8]) by mta08-winn.mailhost.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20050501091601.VJCN21532.mta08-winn.mailhost.ntl.com@aamta05-winn.mailhost.ntl.com>; Sun, 1 May 2005 10:16:01 +0100 Received: from cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com ([82.16.12.40]) by aamta05-winn.mailhost.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20050501091601.JVNV1280.aamta05-winn.mailhost.ntl.com@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>; Sun, 1 May 2005 10:16:01 +0100 Received: from littlepinkcloud.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j419FuuJ003094; Sun, 1 May 2005 10:15:57 +0100 Received: (from aph@localhost) by littlepinkcloud.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id j419Ftbn003090; Sun, 1 May 2005 10:15:55 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17012.40523.17146.122855@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 09:16:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley To: Richard Henderson Cc: Ian Lance Taylor , Andreas Schwab , Gcc Mailing List Subject: Re: libjava build times In-Reply-To: <20050501034829.GA27933@redhat.com> References: <200504271441.j3REfND27584@makai.watson.ibm.com> <426FAA43.7030009@3am-software.com> <17010.666.458892.446031@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <17010.27400.618827.676847@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <20050429203546.GA10338@redhat.com> <17011.20727.7479.172161@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <20050501034829.GA27933@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 Richard Henderson writes: > > Now, unless I've done something drastically wrong, it appears as if we > are spending 2/3 of our time in the libtool script. Yes, that's right. That's similar to what my oprofile experiments suggest. Andrew.