public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 18:50:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <17046.4464.480323.799959@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42960D33.2030607@coyotegulch.com>

After some off-line exchanges with Dave Korn, it seems to me that part
of the problem is that the documentation for
-funsafe-math-optimizations is so vague as to have no discernable
meaning. 

For example, does the wording of the documentation convey the
limitation that one should only invoke math functions with a small
range of arguments (say, -pi to +pi)?  I cannot see anything remotely
resembling that limitation, but others can.

Given that, I wonder how we can tell whether a particular proposed
optimization governed by that flag is permissible.  Consider:

`-funsafe-math-optimizations'
     Allow optimizations for floating-point arithmetic that (a) assume
     that arguments and results are valid and (b) may violate IEEE or
     ANSI standards.  

What does (b) mean?  What if anything are its limitations?  Is
returning 1.2e27 as the result for a sin() call authorized by (b)?  I
would not have expected that, but I can't defend that expectation
based on a literal reading of the text...

      paul

  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-26 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-26 16:05 Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-26 16:09 ` Andrew Haley
2005-05-26 16:33   ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-26 17:14     ` Andrew Haley
2005-05-26 17:01   ` Paolo Carlini
2005-05-26 17:23 ` Richard Henderson
2005-05-26 17:24   ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-26 17:27     ` Paul Koning
2005-05-26 17:27       ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-26 17:29         ` Dave Korn
2005-05-26 17:37           ` David Daney
2005-05-26 17:56             ` Dave Korn
2005-05-26 17:40           ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-26 18:12             ` Paul Koning
2005-05-26 18:32               ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-26 18:50                 ` Paul Koning [this message]
2005-05-26 19:14                   ` Andrew Pinski
2005-05-26 19:35                     ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-29  6:22                   ` Geoffrey Keating
2005-05-31 14:34                     ` Paul Koning
2005-05-31 22:58                       ` Geoff Keating
2005-05-29 12:07                 ` Roger Sayle
2005-05-30 15:34                   ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-29  2:22         ` Kai Henningsen
2005-05-29 18:16         ` Marc Espie
2005-05-29 20:58           ` Georg Bauhaus
2005-05-30 15:19             ` Marc Espie
2005-05-30 17:26               ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-30 17:18                 ` Marc Espie
2005-05-30 18:11                   ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-30 17:31               ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-31  3:10                 ` chris jefferson
2005-05-31 12:17                   ` Andrew Haley
2005-05-31 12:46                   ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-31 13:02                     ` Andrew Haley
2005-05-31 13:34                 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-30 15:19             ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-05-30 15:35             ` Bernhard R. Link
2005-05-30 18:59               ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-30 19:16               ` Georg Bauhaus
2005-05-30 19:17                 ` Bernhard R. Link
2005-05-30 19:54                   ` Georg Bauhaus
2005-05-30 20:04                     ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-05-26 17:35       ` Kevin Handy
2005-05-26 17:41         ` Paul Koning
2005-05-26 20:26           ` Joseph S. Myers
2005-05-26 21:15     ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-05-26 21:17       ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-26 23:25         ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-05-27  0:18           ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-27  0:54             ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-05-27 11:29           ` Marcin Dalecki
2005-05-27  9:36         ` Marcin Dalecki
2005-05-27 10:48       ` Marcin Dalecki
2005-05-26 21:33     ` Richard Henderson
2005-05-27  0:05       ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-27  0:43         ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-05-27  0:54           ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-28 11:26             ` Russ Allbery
2005-05-27 13:56     ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-29  3:36   ` Kai Henningsen
2005-05-26 17:53 Morten Welinder
2005-05-26 18:10 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-26 18:22   ` Dave Korn
2005-05-26 18:49     ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-26 19:28       ` Dave Korn
2005-05-26 18:38 Morten Welinder
2005-05-26 20:58 ` Andrew Haley
2005-05-26 23:31 Uros Bizjak
2005-05-26 23:52 ` Paul Koning
2005-05-26 23:56 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2005-05-26 23:57   ` Steven Bosscher
2005-05-27 15:09   ` Olivier Galibert
2005-05-27 15:28     ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-27 18:27     ` Marcin Dalecki
2005-05-26 23:59 Menezes, Evandro
2005-05-27 15:19 ` Vincent Lefevre
2005-05-27  0:39 Menezes, Evandro
2005-05-27  0:54 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-27  0:54 Menezes, Evandro
2005-05-27  0:54 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-27 12:42 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-28  4:32 Menezes, Evandro
2005-05-28  5:02 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-28 10:44 ` Gary Funck
2005-05-28  6:42 Menezes, Evandro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=17046.4464.480323.799959@gargle.gargle.HOWL \
    --to=pkoning@equallogic.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).