From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-105527-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10063 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2004 19:28:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10038 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2004 19:28:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO develer.com) (151.38.19.110)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 20 Nov 2004 19:28:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 20167 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2004 19:28:14 -0000
Received: from mimas.trilan (HELO mimas) (10.3.3.245)
  by ns.trilan with SMTP; 20 Nov 2004 19:28:14 -0000
Message-ID: <175901c4cf37$1440d2c0$f503030a@mimas>
From: "Giovanni Bajo" <rasky@develer.com>
To: "sean darcy" <seandarcy@hotmail.com>
Cc: <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <BAY20-F2748FED4500C13DB2AB0F3BBC40@phx.gbl>
Subject: Re: Is it time to start using 4.0?
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 06:24:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00720.txt.bz2

sean darcy <seandarcy@hotmail.com> wrote:

> FWIW, there's little I cou;ld find about the expected benefits - to the
end
> user - of the shift to the 4.0 architecture. Conformance? Speed of
> compilation? Quality of code produced - size? speed? Or does the modular
> nature allow for all these good things once the base works? IOW, wait for
> 4.1?

FYI, I am planning to include this user-level information into
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.0/changes.html as we approach the release.
-- 
Giovanni Bajo