From: dank@kegel.com
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: dank@kegel.com
Subject: re: c++ performance regressions in gcc > 2.95.3
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 23:46:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1781.24.126.76.52.1123371986.squirrel@webmail3.pair.com> (raw)
Anthony wrote:
> We observed that certain large C++ applications perform worse
> in gcc-3.x and gcc-4.x than they did in gcc-2.95.3.
> On the theory that at least some of the cause
> would show up in microbenchmarks, we tried running
> bench++ with both old and new toolchains.
> ...
> http://www.cis.udel.edu/~danalis/OSS/bench_plus_plus/ ...
The biggest unreported regression in in the S000005 tests:
(times are ns per iteration)
==== Fill a buffer using different levels of abstraction
g++295 g++401 g++410_0723
S000005a 3870.00 20840.00* 21240.00*
S000005b 3878.00 21120.00* 21140.00*
S000005c 3782.00 3894.00* 21320.00*
S000005d 3862.00 21360.00* 21220.00*
S000005e 3916.00 3834.00 19780.00*
S000005f 3818.00 3936.00* 21160.00*
S000005g 3940.00 20280.00* 20640.00*
S000005h 3868.00 21040.00* 21540.00*
S000005i 3928.00 20060.00* 21480.00*
S000005j 3844.00 21840.00* 21140.00*
S000005k 3912.00 3750.00 3964.00*
S000005l 3946.00 21360.00* 3912.00
S000005m 4746.00 3958.00 3904.00
Most of these are slow in both gcc-4.0.1 and gcc-4.1.
S000005e was fine in gcc-4.0.1,
but is suddenly slower in gcc-4.1.
Anthony, can you try submitting a reduced test case for
S000005e?
Thanks,
Dan
next reply other threads:[~2005-08-06 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-06 23:46 dank [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-06 0:57 Anthony Danalis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1781.24.126.76.52.1123371986.squirrel@webmail3.pair.com \
--to=dank@kegel.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).