From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20069 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2008 13:17:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 20059 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jan 2008 13:17:06 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:16:49 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0GDGl6F029858 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:16:47 -0500 Received: from zebedee.littlepinkcloud.COM (vpn-14-101.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.101]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m0GDGka8006649; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:16:46 -0500 Received: from littlepinkcloud.COM (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zebedee.littlepinkcloud.COM (8.13.8/8.13.5) with ESMTP id m0GDGkG1028310; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:16:46 GMT Received: (from aph@localhost) by littlepinkcloud.COM (8.13.8/8.13.5/Submit) id m0GDGjLB028304; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:16:45 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18318.957.72462.573750@zebedee.pink> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:20:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley To: Sergei Poselenov Cc: Duncan Sands , gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: powercp-linux cross GCC 4.2 vs GCC 4.0.0: -Os code size regression? In-Reply-To: <478DF556.2030705@emcraft.com> References: <478DE61D.3060709@emcraft.com> <200801161237.14734.duncan.sands@math.u-psud.fr> <478DF556.2030705@emcraft.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.93.1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00235.txt.bz2 Sergei Poselenov writes: > > No, all results are for the GCC project. "Mainline" here means the > current development version of GCC. For it, the sum of the test code > size is 3503061, vs. 3542052 for the gcc_4_0_0 branch. But again, > this performance is achieved by the significant regression for the > most of the test packages. Hold on, that's a 1.1% improvement in code size, not a regression. Andrew. -- Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903