* Stack frame size increase
@ 1999-03-24 4:37 Jan Hubicka
[not found] ` < 19990324133713.36426@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz >
1999-03-31 23:46 ` Jan Hubicka
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Hubicka @ 1999-03-24 4:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: egcs
Hi
I've just updated the first june snapshot to the last snapshot 0314.
(It don't contain the align-stack-double patch yet).
My program slowed down, when looking for the purpose I found that stack
frame size increased from 24 to 28 making the doubles missaligned.
This is not the main problem. Interesting is, that rest of function
was equivalent (except the label numbers) to the original.
Why the extra stack slot was allocated?
Is the increase bug or feature?
Honza
--
OK. Lets make a signature file.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Jan Hubicka (Jan Hubi\v{c}ka in TeX) hubicka@freesoft.cz |
| Czech free software foundation: http://www.freesoft.cz |
|AA project - the new way for computer graphics - http://www.ta.jcu.cz/aa |
| homepage: http://www.paru.cas.cz/~hubicka/ , games koules, Xonix, fast |
| fractal zoomer XaoS, index of Czech GNU/Linux/UN*X documentation etc. |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread[parent not found: < 19990324133713.36426@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz >]
* Re: Stack frame size increase
[not found] ` < 19990324133713.36426@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz >
@ 1999-03-24 12:47 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-03-31 23:46 ` Jeffrey A Law
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey A Law @ 1999-03-24 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Hubicka; +Cc: egcs
In message < 19990324133713.36426@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz >you write:
> Hi
> I've just updated the first june snapshot to the last snapshot 0314.
> (It don't contain the align-stack-double patch yet).
>
> My program slowed down, when looking for the purpose I found that stack
> frame size increased from 24 to 28 making the doubles missaligned.
> This is not the main problem. Interesting is, that rest of function
> was equivalent (except the label numbers) to the original.
> Why the extra stack slot was allocated?
>
> Is the increase bug or feature?
Debug the code. The point of the new code is to make sure that if we are
given an aligned frame that we keep it aligned.
As I mentioned, it is likely that we don't handle all cases yet, so this kind
of thing isn't totally unexpected.
jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: Stack frame size increase
1999-03-24 12:47 ` Jeffrey A Law
@ 1999-03-31 23:46 ` Jeffrey A Law
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey A Law @ 1999-03-31 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Hubicka; +Cc: egcs
In message < 19990324133713.36426@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz >you write:
> Hi
> I've just updated the first june snapshot to the last snapshot 0314.
> (It don't contain the align-stack-double patch yet).
>
> My program slowed down, when looking for the purpose I found that stack
> frame size increased from 24 to 28 making the doubles missaligned.
> This is not the main problem. Interesting is, that rest of function
> was equivalent (except the label numbers) to the original.
> Why the extra stack slot was allocated?
>
> Is the increase bug or feature?
Debug the code. The point of the new code is to make sure that if we are
given an aligned frame that we keep it aligned.
As I mentioned, it is likely that we don't handle all cases yet, so this kind
of thing isn't totally unexpected.
jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Stack frame size increase
1999-03-24 4:37 Stack frame size increase Jan Hubicka
[not found] ` < 19990324133713.36426@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz >
@ 1999-03-31 23:46 ` Jan Hubicka
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Hubicka @ 1999-03-31 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: egcs
Hi
I've just updated the first june snapshot to the last snapshot 0314.
(It don't contain the align-stack-double patch yet).
My program slowed down, when looking for the purpose I found that stack
frame size increased from 24 to 28 making the doubles missaligned.
This is not the main problem. Interesting is, that rest of function
was equivalent (except the label numbers) to the original.
Why the extra stack slot was allocated?
Is the increase bug or feature?
Honza
--
OK. Lets make a signature file.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Jan Hubicka (Jan Hubi\v{c}ka in TeX) hubicka@freesoft.cz |
| Czech free software foundation: http://www.freesoft.cz |
|AA project - the new way for computer graphics - http://www.ta.jcu.cz/aa |
| homepage: http://www.paru.cas.cz/~hubicka/ , games koules, Xonix, fast |
| fractal zoomer XaoS, index of Czech GNU/Linux/UN*X documentation etc. |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1999-03-31 23:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1999-03-24 4:37 Stack frame size increase Jan Hubicka
[not found] ` < 19990324133713.36426@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz >
1999-03-24 12:47 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-03-31 23:46 ` Jeffrey A Law
1999-03-31 23:46 ` Jan Hubicka
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).