From: law@redhat.com
To: Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Higher level RTL issues
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 09:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19662.1003768456@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <071E8F7C-C4E4-11D5-B9EF-0030657B5340@cgsoftware.com>
In message < 071E8F7C-C4E4-11D5-B9EF-0030657B5340@cgsoftware.com >you write:
> >
> <snip the rest, for various reasons, i'm not going to reply>
>
> > I'll have to show you an example where you do need renaming to perform
> > relatively simple redundancy elimination problems that are found by any
> > reasonable value numbering scheme.
> Please, do.
I'm going to try to get it to y'all today.
FWIW, I'm not the only person to recognize this issue with using SSA without
actually rewriting the IL. Here's one thread from comp.compilers on the
subject:
http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/01-01-147
http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/01-02-004
http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/01-02-006
http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/01-02-007
http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/01-02-043
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-22 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-09 19:46 law
2001-10-09 20:54 ` Diego Novillo
2001-10-09 21:27 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-10-09 21:49 ` Diego Novillo
2001-10-09 22:23 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-10-19 14:39 ` law
2001-10-19 12:19 ` law
2001-10-09 21:18 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-10-09 21:33 ` Diego Novillo
2001-10-19 14:37 ` law
2001-10-19 15:53 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-10-22 9:31 ` law [this message]
2001-10-22 11:49 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-10-13 2:27 ` Jan Hubicka
2001-10-19 12:03 ` law
2001-10-21 10:40 ` Jan Hubicka
2001-10-22 8:28 ` law
2001-10-22 8:36 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-10-22 8:56 ` law
2001-10-22 9:07 ` Jan Hubicka
2001-10-22 11:32 ` law
2001-10-22 15:07 ` Richard Henderson
2001-10-23 15:16 ` Joern Rennecke
2001-10-22 16:22 ` Joern Rennecke
2001-10-23 3:02 ` Jan Hubicka
2001-10-23 15:28 ` law
2001-10-24 7:59 ` Jan Hubicka
2001-10-22 11:30 law
2001-10-22 13:10 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-10-22 14:02 ` law
2001-10-22 14:25 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-10-22 14:28 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-10-22 14:48 ` law
2001-11-13 13:41 ` Diego Novillo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19662.1003768456@localhost.localdomain \
--to=law@redhat.com \
--cc=dan@cgsoftware.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).