Re: RS6000 vs. egcs

Re: RS6000 vs. egcs

[meissner]

| I now have a version of egcs which is working better.  It turns out
| that I was bitten by a bug in an alpha version of g77, which caused
| all kinds of problems.  I now have 970901 (the move-if-change patch
| works) and the output of "make check" is:

	...

Of the gcc tests, the following I know about and are long standing:

compile/961203-1.c	is a generic bug, fails for all platforms
execute/931004-11.c	is a bug in passing small structures
execute/931004-12.c	is a bug in passing small structures

I've seen execute/{ieee,fp-cmp-1,complex-5}.c fail for other architectures as
well as the rs600/powerpc.

Re: RS6000 vs. egcs

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < 199709040349.XAA02218@nemo.rutgers.edu >you write:
  > all kinds of problems.  I now have 970901 (the move-if-change patch
  > works) and the output of "make check" is:
  > 
  >                 === libio tests ===
  > 
  > FAIL: tfformat.c compilation 
  > FAIL: tiformat.c compilation 
  > FAIL: tstdiomisc.c compilation 
I suspect these are a problem with the dejagnu framework not
knowing about the "libraries" changes.  I'm looking into it.

Jeff

RS6000 vs. egcs

[Kate Hedstrom]

I now have a version of egcs which is working better.  It turns out
that I was bitten by a bug in an alpha version of g77, which caused
all kinds of problems.  I now have 970901 (the move-if-change patch
works) and the output of "make check" is:

                === libio tests ===

FAIL: tfformat.c compilation 
FAIL: tiformat.c compilation 
FAIL: tstdiomisc.c compilation 

                === libio Summary ===

# of expected passes            33
# of unexpected failures        3
# of expected failures          4

                === libstdc++ Summary ===

# of expected passes            30

                === gcc tests ===

FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/961203-1.c,  -O0  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/961203-1.c,  -O1  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/961203-1.c,  -O2  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/961203-1.c,  -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-funct
ions  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/931004-11.c execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/931004-11.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/931004-11.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/931004-12.c execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/931004-12.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/931004-12.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/931004-12.c execution,  -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fi
nline-functions 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/931004-12.c execution,  -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fi
nline-functions -funroll-loops 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/931004-12.c execution,  -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fi
nline-functions -funroll-all-loops 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-5.c execution,  -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fi
nline-functions 
Running /d0/kate/gnu/egcs-970901/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.e
xp ...
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-1.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-1.c execution,  -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
 -finline-functions 

                === gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes            4863
# of unexpected failures        16
# of expected failures          4
# of unsupported tests          7

                === g++ tests ===

FAIL: g++.brendan/crash19.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.brendan/scope4.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.mike/p7325.C *-*-* Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/p811.C (test for excess errors)

                === g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes            3264
# of unexpected failures        2
# of unexpected successes       2
# of expected failures          83
# of untested testcases         6

Kate