From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jim Wilson <wilson@chestnut.cygnus.com>
To: cwax@pacbell.net
Cc: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>, egcs team <egcs@cygnus.com>
Subject: Re: testing consistency 
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 1997 21:11:00 -0000
Message-id: <199709050411.VAA08878@cygnus.com>
References: <199709050313.UAA00847@mail-gw2.pacbell.net>
X-SW-Source: 1997-09/msg00181.html

	also we should check -Ox without -g .  I know in the past this
	combination was explicitly noted as possibly dangerous

It is a gcc policy that -Ox -g should always generate exactly the same code
as -Ox.  So there should not be anything dangerous with using just -Ox,
other than the fact that you won't be able to debug the code if it ever
fails.  Of course, it doesn't hurt to test it every once in a while to make
sure this is still true.

Jim