* Why libio in egcs is older than glibc?
@ 1997-09-07 19:38 H.J. Lu
1997-09-08 1:32 ` Jim Wilson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: H.J. Lu @ 1997-09-07 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: drepper; +Cc: egcs
Hi,
I took a look at the new libio in egcs. It is much better than the
old one. But it is still older than the one in glibc 2.1. Neither
of them is entirely right for linux/libc/glibc. I will send you
a patch in a day or 2.
Thanks.
--
H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.ai.mit.edu)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Why libio in egcs is older than glibc?
1997-09-07 19:38 Why libio in egcs is older than glibc? H.J. Lu
@ 1997-09-08 1:32 ` Jim Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jim Wilson @ 1997-09-08 1:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H.J. Lu; +Cc: drepper, egcs
I took a look at the new libio in egcs. It is much better than the
old one. But it is still older than the one in glibc 2.1.
My understanding is that this is just the first set of patches from Ulrich,
and that additional patches are expected soon.
Jim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1997-09-08 1:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1997-09-07 19:38 Why libio in egcs is older than glibc? H.J. Lu
1997-09-08 1:32 ` Jim Wilson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).