public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
To: ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu (Kaveh R. Ghazi)
Cc: law@cygnus.com, oliva@dcc.unicamp.br, egcs@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: testing consistency
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 10:20:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <199709191719.KAA20032@atrus.synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <199709191641.MAA00637@caip.rutgers.edu>

> 	Its great that -O2 is used by default now.  But if we don't
> test the >O2 opts more, we can't expect them to get safe enough to
> use.

I agree *but* -- we must make sure that there is a set of flags that
is thoroughly and consistently tested.  I have no problem with people
running tests and fixing problems with other combinations, *as long as*
we have tests with "-g -O2" for as many platforms as possible.  Given
the exponential blowup in the number of possible combinations of flags,
we can pretty much guarantee that certain combinations of flags are
likely to produce a buggy gcc executable, so we also want to be able
to recommend to the public that they compile gcc with the flags we've
done the most testing on.

  reply	other threads:[~1997-09-19 10:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1997-09-19  9:52 Kaveh R. Ghazi
1997-09-19 10:20 ` Joe Buck [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1997-09-18 21:42 Mike Stump
1997-09-18 21:50 ` Jeffrey A Law
1997-09-18 21:55 ` Joe Buck
     [not found] <oren6qtfsg.fsf@sunsite.dcc.unicamp.br>
1997-09-18 20:37 ` Jeffrey A Law
1997-09-18 21:32   ` Alexandre Oliva
1997-09-18 22:24     ` Jeffrey A Law
1997-09-15 14:44 Alexandre Oliva
1997-09-11 21:33 Peter Seebach
     [not found] <199709112227.SAA01970cygnus.egcs@tweedledumb.cygnus.com>
1997-09-11 16:31 ` not-for-mail
1997-09-11 15:27 meissner
1997-09-11 16:06 ` Doug Evans
1997-09-11 17:08 ` Joe Buck
1997-09-11 11:36 Mike Stump
1997-09-11 12:47 ` Jim Wilson
1997-09-10 22:37 Aaron Jackson
1997-09-11  0:40 ` Jim Wilson
1997-09-11  9:23 ` Jeffrey A Law
1997-09-11 10:17 ` H.J. Lu
1997-09-11 11:05   ` Jeffrey A Law
1997-09-11 11:05     ` H.J. Lu
1997-09-11 11:05       ` Jeffrey A Law
1997-09-11 11:36         ` H.J. Lu
1997-09-11 11:36           ` Jeffrey A Law
1997-09-11 12:54             ` H.J. Lu
1997-09-11 13:20               ` Jeffrey A Law
1997-09-11 14:01                 ` Per Bothner
1997-09-11 15:09                   ` Richard Henderson
1997-09-18 12:57                   ` Bob Glickstein
1997-09-11 13:37             ` Jim Wilson
1997-09-11 14:11               ` Per Bothner
1997-09-11 15:01               ` Jeffrey A Law
1997-09-11 16:13                 ` Joe Buck
1997-09-11 17:08                 ` Jim Wilson
1997-09-11 18:39                   ` Joe Buck
1997-09-11 13:20           ` Per Bothner
1997-09-12  7:27         ` Paul Koning
1997-09-11 12:57   ` Ian Lance Taylor
1997-09-11 13:51     ` H.J. Lu
1997-09-11 13:54       ` Ian Lance Taylor
1997-09-11 13:59         ` H.J. Lu
1997-09-11 14:04           ` Ian Lance Taylor
1997-09-11 19:01   ` Jim Wilson
1997-09-14 12:06 ` Joel Sherrill
1997-09-14 12:19   ` Jeffrey A Law
1997-09-14 12:44     ` Joel Sherrill
1997-09-18 22:56       ` Jeffrey A Law
1997-09-19  8:04         ` H.J. Lu
1997-09-19  8:15           ` Jeffrey A Law
1997-09-19 12:19           ` Jim Wilson
1997-09-19 13:14             ` Joe Buck
1997-09-19 14:51               ` Dave Love
1997-09-19 17:12               ` Jeffrey A Law
1997-09-05 18:09 meissner
1997-09-05 18:55 ` Joel Sherrill
1997-09-04 18:48 Joe Buck
1997-09-04 20:13 ` Dave Avery
1997-09-04 21:11   ` Jim Wilson
1997-09-05  8:56     ` Joe Buck
1997-09-05  8:58   ` Joe Buck
1997-09-05  7:26 ` Joel Sherrill
1997-09-05 12:44   ` Jeffrey A Law
1997-09-05 16:40     ` Joel Sherrill
1997-09-10 15:21 ` Jeffrey A Law
1997-09-10 16:15   ` Joe Buck
1997-09-10 16:22     ` Jeffrey A Law
1997-09-10 22:23     ` Alexandre Oliva
1997-09-11  9:23       ` Jeffrey A Law
1997-09-11 10:01     ` Jeffrey A Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=199709191719.KAA20032@atrus.synopsys.com \
    --to=jbuck@synopsys.com \
    --cc=egcs@cygnus.com \
    --cc=ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu \
    --cc=law@cygnus.com \
    --cc=oliva@dcc.unicamp.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).